This analysis describes what Duolingo's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
You and Tinder consent to the exercise of personal jurisdiction of courts in the State of Texas and waive any claim that such courts constitute an inconvenient forum.
the Parties expressly consent to personal jurisdiction and venue in those courts.
The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction over ZipRecruiter's compliance with the EU-U.S. DPF, the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. DPF.
"a statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of the federal court in the judicial district in which you reside, or if you reside outside of the United States, then of the federal court in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania...Excerpt from Duolingo's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “a statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of the federal court in the judicial district in which you reside, or if you reside outside of the United States, then of the federal court in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Duolingo.