All legal disputes with Duolingo are governed by Pennsylvania law and must be brought in Pennsylvania courts, regardless of where you live.
This analysis describes what Duolingo's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The clause designates a specific governing law and exclusive forum for dispute resolution, which determines which substantive law applies to contract interpretation and which court system has authority over disputes. This establishes the procedural and legal framework for any litigation related to the service agreement.
Interpretive note: Forum selection and choice of law clauses are generally unenforceable against EU and UK consumers under applicable consumer protection law; California and other states may also apply their own mandatory statutes regardless of this clause.
If you pursue a legal claim against Duolingo outside of arbitration, you would generally need to do so in Pennsylvania courts under Pennsylvania law, which may be impractical or unenforceable depending on your location.
How other platforms handle this
These Terms shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of law principles. Any disputes not subject to arbitration shall be resolved exclusively in the state or federal courts located in San Francisco County, California, and you consent to the personal jurisd...
This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of People's Republic of China, excluding its conflict of laws principles.
These Terms and any action related thereto will be governed by the laws of the State of California, without regard to its conflict of laws provisions. Except as otherwise expressly set forth in the Dispute Resolution section, the exclusive jurisdiction for all Disputes (as defined below) that you an...
Monitoring
Duolingo has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"These Terms are governed by and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, without regard to its conflict of law provisions. Any legal action or proceeding arising under these Terms will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in Pennsylvania, and the parties hereby irrevocably consent to personal jurisdiction and venue there.— Excerpt from Duolingo's Duolingo Terms of Service
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Choice of law and forum selection clauses are standard in U.S. technology company terms. Pennsylvania law governs; however, mandatory consumer protection statutes in the user's home jurisdiction (including GDPR for EU users, CCPA for California residents, and equivalent state laws) may apply regardless of the contractual choice of law. EU courts generally will not enforce forum selection clauses that require EU consumers to litigate abroad. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low for U.S. users in most cases, as Pennsylvania courts are a reasonable forum for a company headquartered in Pittsburgh. Medium for international users, as the clause is likely unenforceable as applied to EU and UK consumers who retain rights to litigate in their home jurisdiction. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK consumers cannot be compelled by contract to litigate exclusively in foreign courts under applicable consumer protection law. California's consumer protection statutes may apply regardless of choice of law provisions. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: For institutional clients outside Pennsylvania, the forum selection clause may be a negotiating point for enterprise agreements, particularly where multi-jurisdictional data processing obligations are involved. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should confirm that the governing law clause does not inadvertently disclaim applicable mandatory consumer protection statutes in key markets, and that differentiated terms or addenda address EU, UK, and California law where required.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The clause designates a specific governing law and exclusive forum for dispute resolution, which determines which substantive law applies to contract interpretation and which court system has authority over disputes. This establishes the procedural and legal framework for any litigation related to the service agreement.
If you pursue a legal claim against Duolingo outside of arbitration, you would generally need to do so in Pennsylvania courts under Pennsylvania law, which may be impractical or unenforceable depending on your location.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 5 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Duolingo.