Provision record
Databricks · Databricks Terms of Service · View original document ↗

User Indemnification

High severity Common · 228 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Databricks and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

If your use of the Databricks website causes a legal claim against Databricks, you personally agree to cover their legal costs and any resulting damages.

This analysis describes what Databricks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The indemnification clause establishes a cost-shifting mechanism whereby users assume financial responsibility for defending Databricks against claims connected to their own contractual violations or service use, rather than such costs remaining with Databricks as the service provider.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

This provision means that if a third party sues Databricks because of something you did on their website, you are responsible for Databricks' legal defense costs and any resulting judgments — a potentially significant financial exposure for business users and developers.

How other platforms handle this

Tabnine Medium

Any claim that any user submission made by you has caused damage to a third party

Instacart Medium

Any access to or use of the Services or goods through your account by others, including your spouse, dependents, Recipients, and any access by AI Agents you enable or that operate on your behalf...

Walmart Medium

you agree to cooperate with Walmart if and as requested by Walmart in the defense and settlement of such matter.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Databricks and its officers, directors, employees, agents, licensors, and service providers from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, judgments, awards, losses, costs, expenses, or fees (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or relating to your violation of these Terms or your use of the Sites.

Excerpt from Databricks's Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

1) REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: Indemnification clauses of this breadth implicate FTC Act Section 5 scrutiny where terms may be deemed unfair or deceptive if applied to ordinary consumers.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →
  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Applicable regulations

FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Databricks Terms of Service
Entity
Databricks
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
April 30, 2026
Last verified
April 30, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-004161
Document ID
CA-D-00459
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
7abbfeba6080f930e9d7563aac6110262009f470352cbf53b12c8cb241acc68c
Analysis generated
April 30, 2026 06:42 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Databricks
Document: Databricks Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-004161
Captured: 2026-04-30 06:42:39 UTC
SHA-256: 7abbfeba6080f930…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/databricks/databricks-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-004161/user-indemnification/
Accessed: Sept. 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Databricks's User Indemnification clause do?

The indemnification clause establishes a cost-shifting mechanism whereby users assume financial responsibility for defending Databricks against claims connected to their own contractual violations or service use, rather than such costs remaining with Databricks as the service provider.

How does this clause affect you?

This provision means that if a third party sues Databricks because of something you did on their website, you are responsible for Databricks' legal defense costs and any resulting judgments — a potentially significant financial exposure for business users and developers.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 228 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Databricks?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Databricks.