Provision record
Databricks · Databricks Terms of Service · View original document ↗

No Settlement Without Databricks Written Consent

Common · 224 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Databricks and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Databricks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Heap

The Indemnifying Party shall not, without the relevant applicable Indemnified Parties' prior written consent, agree to any settlement on behalf of such Indemnified Parties which includes either the obligation to pay any amounts, or any admissions of liability...

Loom

Customer may not settle an Infringement Claim without Atlassian's prior written consent.

Modal

the indemnifying party shall have no obligation to indemnify or reimburse for any losses, damages, costs, disbursements, expenses, settlement liability of a claim or other sums paid by any Indemnified Party voluntarily, and without the indemnifying party's prior written consent

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Databricks reserves the right, however, to assume the exclusive defense and control of any matter otherwise subject to indemnification by you and, in such case, you agree to cooperate with Databricks’ defense of such claim, and in no event may you agree to any settlement affecting Databricks without Databricks' prior written consent.

Excerpt from Databricks's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Databricks Terms of Service
Entity
Databricks
Date stated by the document
May 25, 2018
As printed in Databricks’s text (version CA-V-006770), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
April 29, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006770, captured Sept. 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-046721
Document ID
CA-D-000459
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006770)
14cd440a1287368639f3ada1eaaef28d07064d526b89efe99dc15ba4fd34bd07
Analysis generated
May 10, 2026 02:08 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006770, captured Sept. 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 6, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Databricks
Document: Databricks Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-046721
Version: CA-V-006770
Captured: 2026-09-11 00:56:38 UTC
SHA-256: 14cd440a12873686…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/databricks/databricks-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-046721/no-settlement-without-databricks-written-consent/
Accessed: Oct. 24, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Databricks's No Settlement Without Databricks Written Consent clause do?

The clause states: “Databricks reserves the right, however, to assume the exclusive defense and control of any matter otherwise subject to indemnification by you and, in such case, you agree to cooperate with Databricks’ defense of such claim, and in no event may you agree to any settlement affecting Databricks without Databricks' prior …”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 224 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Databricks?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Databricks.