This analysis describes what Databricks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Any claim that any user submission made by you has caused damage to a third party
NVIDIA will have no obligation...to indemnify...with respect to any Indemnifiable Claim relating to...any use of the Enterprise Products in violation of applicable laws or regulations, or expressly prohibited by the Agreement or the Enterprise Product's documentation...
Any access to or use of the Services or goods through your account by others, including your spouse, dependents, Recipients, and any access by AI Agents you enable or that operate on your behalf...
"arising out of or in connection with (a) your use of the Sites, including without limitation any of your Submissions, (b) your breach of these Terms...(c) your violation of any law or regulation or of any third party rights...Excerpt from Databricks's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “arising out of or in connection with (a) your use of the Sites, including without limitation any of your Submissions, (b) your breach of these Terms...(c) your violation of any law or regulation or of any third party rights...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 228 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Databricks.