This analysis describes what Cursor's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
These restrictions address concerns about data exposure to Chinese legal jurisdiction, both through direct infrastructure presence and through subprocessor relationships.
Interpretive note: The third proposition—that subprocessors do not themselves use China-headquartered subprocessors—is qualified by 'to our knowledge' and was omitted from the canonical claim as a secondary proposition. It is noted in omitted_material and what_this_means.
Readers can expect that neither Cursor's infrastructure nor its direct subprocessors are located in or headquartered in China.
How other platforms handle this
disclosure is required by a third-party to complete a transaction initiated by the user
Each payment processor uses and processes your complete payment information in accordance with its applicable privacy policy (Stripe and PayPal).
These companies are subject to contractual obligations governing privacy, data security, and confidentiality consistent with applicable laws.
Monitoring
Cursor has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Cursor does not use or maintain any infrastructure in China. We do not use any companies headquartered in China as subprocessors, and to our knowledge none of our subprocessors do either.— Excerpt from Cursor's Cursor Security Practices
ConductAtlas detected a major restructuring of Meta’s privacy policy that removed detailed consumer rights disclosures and relocated them to separate documents.
Your genetic data may be transferred to a new owner as a business asset. Here is what the Terms of Service actually say and what you can do right now.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
These restrictions address concerns about data exposure to Chinese legal jurisdiction, both through direct infrastructure presence and through subprocessor relationships.
Readers can expect that neither Cursor's infrastructure nor its direct subprocessors are located in or headquartered in China.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 290 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cursor.