This analysis describes what Cursor's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Annual re-review means subprocessors are not assessed only at onboarding; their risk profile is checked on a recurring basis.
Readers can expect that every company Cursor uses to process data is subject to both an initial evaluation and a yearly reassessment.
How other platforms handle this
If you believe we have taken action against your content or account in a way that does not comply with these Terms, you have the right to bring a claim for breach of contract under UK law.
These Terms and the licenses granted hereunder may be assigned by the Company but may not be assigned by you without the prior express written consent of the Company.
Monitoring
Cursor has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Each subprocessor is evaluated under our vendor risk management program and re-reviewed annually.— Excerpt from Cursor's Cursor Security Practices
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
Annual re-review means subprocessors are not assessed only at onboarding; their risk profile is checked on a recurring basis.
Readers can expect that every company Cursor uses to process data is subject to both an initial evaluation and a yearly reassessment.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 300 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cursor.