“Each subprocessor is evaluated under our vendor risk management program and re-reviewed annually.”
This analysis describes what Cursor's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Annual re-review means subprocessors are not assessed only at onboarding; their risk profile is checked on a recurring basis.
Readers can expect that every company Cursor uses to process data is subject to both an initial evaluation and a yearly reassessment.
How other platforms handle this
These Terms contain the entire agreement between you and OpenAI regarding the Services and, other than any Service-specific terms, supersedes any prior or contemporaneous agreements between you and OpenAI.
If any provisions from this Policy are in conflict with any applicable laws, such provisions will be replaced by provisions of the same purport that reflects the original intention of the provision, to the extent permissible under the applicable laws.
"Each subprocessor is evaluated under our vendor risk management program and re-reviewed annually.Excerpt from Cursor's Security Practices
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
Annual re-review means subprocessors are not assessed only at onboarding; their risk profile is checked on a recurring basis.
Readers can expect that every company Cursor uses to process data is subject to both an initial evaluation and a yearly reassessment.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 290 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cursor.