Provision record
Cursor · Cursor Data Use & Privacy Overview · View original document ↗

Privacy Mode Off: AI Training and Model Provider Data Sharing

High severity High confidence Explicit document language Common · 290 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Cursor and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

If Privacy Mode is off, Cursor states it may use your codebase data, prompts, editor actions, and code snippets to train its AI models, and may share prompts and limited telemetry with third-party model providers you select.

This analysis describes what Cursor's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision establishes the full scope of data use when Privacy Mode is disabled, authorizing collection and use of codebase data, prompts, and editor actions for AI model training and disclosure to third-party model providers.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Aug 29, 2026

The updated policy no longer explicitly discloses how Cursor handles plaintext code and metadata during codebase indexing. Previously, the policy stated that plaintext code ceases to exist after each request and that embeddings and metadata may be stored in the database. The removal of this language creates ambiguity about current data handling practices for users who index their codebases.

View change record →
Medium Jun 10, 2026

The updated policy clarifies that Cursor maintains zero data retention agreements with all AI model providers and customer data will not be used for training by Cursor. However, the policy now explicitly discloses that model providers may run risk classifiers to detect policy violations, and if your prompts or conversations trigger abuse detectors, your data may be stored for investigation and deleted according to the provider's retention policies. The policy removed the previous blanket statement that code would never be trained on by Cursor or third parties, replacing it with more specific disclosure of abuse detection practices. You can review OpenAI and Anthropic's documentation directly for details on their specific retention policies.

View change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

With Privacy Mode off, the document authorizes Cursor to store and use codebase data, prompts, editor actions, and code snippets for AI training purposes, and to share prompts and limited telemetry with third-party model providers when those providers are explicitly selected by the user.

What you can do

⚠️ These actions may provide transparency or partial mitigation but may not fully address the underlying issue. Effectiveness varies by jurisdiction and individual circumstances.
  • Opt Out of Arbitration
    Open Cursor, navigate to Settings, and enable Privacy Mode to prevent your codebase data, prompts, and editor actions from being used for AI model training.

How other platforms handle this

Glassdoor Medium

We will also provide an individual opt-out choice, or opt-in for sensitive data, before we share your data with third parties other than our agents, or before we use it for a purpose other than which it was originally collected.

Square Medium

to request that your data be transferred to a third party (data portability)

Google Cloud Medium

Your organization may allow you to access and export your data in order to back it up or transfer it to a service outside of Google.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
If you choose to turn off "Privacy Mode": we may use and store codebase data, prompts, editor actions, code snippets, and other code data and actions to improve our AI features and train our models. Prompts and limited telemetry may also be shared with model providers when you explicitly select their models.

Excerpt from Cursor's Data Use & Privacy Overview

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision implicates GDPR Articles 6, 9, and 28, particularly the lawful basis for using code data (which may contain personal data) for AI model training and the obligations applicable to sharing …

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →
  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Applicable regulations

EU AI Act
European Union
CCPA/CPRA
California, USA
Colorado AI Act
US-CO
Connecticut Data Privacy Act Amendments
US-CT
EU AI Act - High Risk Provisions
EU
FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal
GDPR
European Union
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act
US-IN
Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
US-KY
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism Expansion 2026
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
Cursor Data Use & Privacy Overview
Entity
Cursor
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 11, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-011151
Document ID
CA-D-00764
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
7bd016281b3f2dcf271223558f9511f2d93cc13a84b3a147251127ce1af62024
Analysis generated
May 11, 2026 13:09 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Cursor
Document: Cursor Data Use & Privacy Overview
Record ID: CA-P-011151
Captured: 2026-05-11 13:09:42 UTC
SHA-256: 7bd016281b3f2dcf…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/cursor/cursor-data-use-privacy-overview/provision/CA-P-011151/privacy-mode-off-ai-training-and-model-provider-data-sharing/
Accessed: Sept. 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Cursor's Privacy Mode Off: AI Training and Model Provider Data Sharing clause do?

This provision establishes the full scope of data use when Privacy Mode is disabled, authorizing collection and use of codebase data, prompts, and editor actions for AI model training and disclosure to third-party model providers.

How does this clause affect you?

With Privacy Mode off, the document authorizes Cursor to store and use codebase data, prompts, editor actions, and code snippets for AI training purposes, and to share prompts and limited telemetry with third-party model providers when those providers are explicitly selected by the user.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 290 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Cursor?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cursor.