Cursor · Cursor Data Use & Privacy Overview · View original document ↗

Abuse-triggered data deleted per retention policies

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 275 of 352 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Cursor Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.

This analysis describes what Cursor's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Abuse-flagged data is subject to a different retention pathway than ordinary data, meaning it may be stored longer or under different conditions before deletion.

Interpretive note: The pronoun 'their' in 'their retention policies' is ambiguous — it could refer to Cursor's policies, the model providers' policies, or both. The primary claim reflects the deletion obligation without resolving that ambiguity.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jun 10, 2026

The updated policy clarifies that Cursor maintains zero data retention agreements with all AI model providers and customer data will not be used for training by Cursor. However, the policy now explicitly discloses that model providers may run risk classifiers to detect policy violations, and if your prompts or conversations trigger abuse detectors, your data may be stored for investigation and deleted according to the provider's retention policies. The policy removed the previous blanket statement that code would never be trained on by Cursor or third parties, replacing it with more specific disclosure of abuse detection practices. You can review OpenAI and Anthropic's documentation directly for details on their specific retention policies.

View change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

If your data triggers an abuse detector, it may be stored for investigation rather than handled under standard data flows, and deleted only per the applicable retention policies.

How other platforms handle this

Affirm Medium

Affirm will retain your information in accordance with our Privacy Policy and any applicable state or federal law, rule or regulation.

Palantir Medium

We collect and keep personal data only as needed or allowed for the purposes set out in this Statement, based on the reason we collected the personal data in the first instance and what is permitted under the laws that apply to the processing.

Upwork Medium

if your Account is closed, you will no longer have access to information or material you kept on the Site and any content stored in your Account may be deleted, for which Upwork expressly disclaims liability.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Cursor has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
if your prompts or conversations trigger abuse detectors your data may be stored for investigation and deleted in accordance with their retention policies.

— Excerpt from Cursor's Cursor Data Use & Privacy Overview

Applicable regulations

CCPA/CPRA
California, USA
GDPR
European Union
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act
US-IN

Provision details

Document information
Document
Cursor Data Use & Privacy Overview
Entity
Cursor
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-059535
Document ID
CA-D-00764
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
b99e852f1ad6e7f2138edb3e355e61411f60e79b811fb2af6c88fcd7ff48ef25
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 14:51 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Cursor
Document: Cursor Data Use & Privacy Overview
Record ID: CA-P-059535
Captured: 2026-07-09 14:51:27 UTC
SHA-256: b99e852f1ad6e7f2…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/cursor/cursor-data-use-privacy-overview/provision/CA-P-059535/abuse-triggered-data-deleted-per-retention-policies/
Accessed: July 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Get Compliance

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Cursor's Abuse-triggered data deleted per retention policies clause do?

Abuse-flagged data is subject to a different retention pathway than ordinary data, meaning it may be stored longer or under different conditions before deletion.

How does this clause affect you?

If your data triggers an abuse detector, it may be stored for investigation rather than handled under standard data flows, and deleted only per the applicable retention policies.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 275 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Cursor?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cursor.