This analysis describes what Calendly's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Mistral AI is responsible for the classification of the Mistral AI Products in accordance with the Applicable AI Laws. For the avoidance of doubt, Mistral AI does not provide any High-Risk AI Systems under the Agreement.
Output is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for advice from a qualified professional.
CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE LEGAL STATUS OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OUTPUT IS UNCERTAIN AND THAT OUTPUTS MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO PROTECTION UNDER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
"CALENDLY DOES NOT ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR RETENTION OF ANY OUTPUT.Excerpt from Calendly's Terms of Use
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “CALENDLY DOES NOT ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR RETENTION OF ANY OUTPUT.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 210 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Calendly.