This analysis describes what Calendly's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The clause narrows the categories of damages available in disputes between Calendly and users by contractually excluding entire classes of compensable harm. This operates as a mutual limitation on liability exposure that applies across tort, warranty, contract, statutory, and equitable theories.
Users and Calendly are both restricted from recovering consequential or indirect damages in disputes, meaning recoverable damages are limited to direct losses. The provision applies regardless of whether the claiming party was aware such damages might result from a breach or failure of performance.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Mutual Exclusion of Consequential Damages and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Calendly has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, NEITHER PARTY WILL BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER PARTY FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, OR DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, REVENUE, GOODWILL, BUSINESS, SAVINGS, DATA, USE, OR COST OF SUBSTITUTE PROCUREMENT, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THESE TERMS, WHETHER OR NOT SUCH DAMAGES ARE BASED ON TORT, WARRANTY, CONTRACT, STATUTE, OR ANY OTHER LEGAL OR EQUITABLE THEORY, EVEN IF A PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.— Excerpt from Calendly's Calendly Terms of Use
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The clause narrows the categories of damages available in disputes between Calendly and users by contractually excluding entire classes of compensable harm. This operates as a mutual limitation on liability exposure that applies across tort, warranty, contract, statutory, and equitable theories.
Users and Calendly are both restricted from recovering consequential or indirect damages in disputes, meaning recoverable damages are limited to direct losses. The provision applies regardless of whether the claiming party was aware such damages might result from a breach or failure of performance.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Calendly.