Provision record
Calendly · Calendly Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Disputes resolved by binding JAMS arbitration

High confidence Common · 197 of 343 platforms

Key Facts · in the document’s own words

How will Disputes between users and Calendly that cannot be resolved through the Pre-Arbitration Claim Resolution process be resolved?
“This Section provides that, except for the “ Exceptions ” identified below in Section 16(g), all Disputes between you and Calendly, which are unable to be resolved pursuant to the Pre-Arbitration Claim Resolution Section below, will be resolved exclusively and finally by binding arbitration rather than in court...”
Version CA-V-006807, captured Sept. 11, 2026 · live source ↗
Our reading, not the document’s words
Calendly requires that all Disputes between users and Calendly that cannot be resolved through the Pre-Arbitration Claim Resolution process will be resolved exclusively and finally by binding arbitration rather than in court.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Calendly and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Calendly's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

Users waive the right to resolve Disputes in court, including the right to a jury trial, unless the matter is first addressed through the Pre-Arbitration Claim Resolution process and remains unresolved.

⚠

Interpretive note: The JAMS administrator detail appears in the clause name but not the excerpt; it is noted in omitted_material but not incorporated into the canonical claim or derived fields.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

If you have a dispute with Calendly that the Pre-Arbitration Claim Resolution process does not resolve, you must pursue it through binding arbitration and cannot bring it to court.

How other platforms handle this

Anyscale

If you use the Anyscale Services on behalf of a business or organization, You and Anyscale agree to resolve any dispute, claim, or controversy...pursuant to Section 10.5.

Target

The arbitration of any Dispute shall be administered by JAMS and conducted in accordance with the JAMS rules, including any Mass Arbitration Procedures and Guidelines applicable to the Dispute ("JAMS Rules")...

OpenAI

If any part of these arbitration terms is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the remainder will remain in effect, except that if a finding...would allow class arbitration...this entire dispute resolution section will be unenforceable.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
This Section provides that, except for the “ Exceptions ” identified below in Section 16(g), all Disputes between you and Calendly, which are unable to be resolved pursuant to the Pre-Arbitration Claim Resolution Section below, will be resolved exclusively and finally by binding arbitration rather than in court...

Excerpt from Calendly's Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
Calendly Terms of Use
Entity
Calendly
Date stated by the document
Aug. 5, 2026
As printed in Calendly’s text (version CA-V-006807), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 5, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006807, captured Sept. 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-048398
Document ID
CA-D-000562
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006807)
ec786bf8ad9a19e3cda317fdf7e9f8854c4298a5be20cf567121a07bb451c2c6
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 05:08 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006807, captured Sept. 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 6, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Calendly
Document: Calendly Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-048398
Version: CA-V-006807
Captured: 2026-09-11 01:02:35 UTC
SHA-256: ec786bf8ad9a19e3…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/calendly/calendly-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-048398/disputes-resolved-by-binding-jams-arbitration/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Calendly's Disputes resolved by binding JAMS arbitration clause do?

Users waive the right to resolve Disputes in court, including the right to a jury trial, unless the matter is first addressed through the Pre-Arbitration Claim Resolution process and remains unresolved.

How does this clause affect you?

If you have a dispute with Calendly that the Pre-Arbitration Claim Resolution process does not resolve, you must pursue it through binding arbitration and cannot bring it to court.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 197 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Calendly?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Calendly.