Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This analysis describes what Baseten's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
any disputes or claims relating in any way to these Terms of Service or your use of the Twitch Services shall be resolved by a competent civil court in the country where you reside.
The courts in Clause 18(b) are the Courts of France.
Any dispute not subject to arbitration and not initiated in small claims court may be brought by either party in a court of competent jurisdiction in either the Superior Courts for the State of California...or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Monitoring
Baseten has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"the Parties agree that any dispute arising from the SCCs in relation to any EU Restricted Transfer shall be resolved by the courts of Ireland...Excerpt from Baseten's Terms of Service
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
The clause states: “the Parties agree that any dispute arising from the SCCs in relation to any EU Restricted Transfer shall be resolved by the courts of Ireland...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 272 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Baseten.