Provision record
Baseten · Baseten Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Customer May Object to New Sub-Processor Within 5 Days

Common · 277 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Baseten and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Baseten's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Kling AI

You have the right to object to our processing of your Data, for example, in case we process your data for direct marketing purposes, as permitted under applicable laws.

Teladoc

If you are a parent or guardian who believes your child under 13 has provided us with Personal Information, please contact us using the information below to request its deletion.

Postman

Covered individuals are able to exercise certain choices under the EU-U.S. DPF, UK DPF Extension, and the Swiss-U.S. DPF regarding how some of their personal information is used and shared, and may access, correct, or delete certain personal information...

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Customer may object in writing to Baseten's appointment of a new Sub-Processor based on reasonable data protection concerns by emailing privacy@baseten.co within five (5) calendar days of notice of the new Sub-Processor...

Excerpt from Baseten's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Baseten Terms of Service
Entity
Baseten
Date stated by the document
Sept. 15, 2026
As printed in Baseten’s text (version CA-V-007645), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
July 11, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-004731, captured July 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-073841
Document ID
CA-D-000813
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-004731)
fc18edee23c4c9909e45b313977ce7b9c30a17086fa9a27f6bf0dbda428e44df
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 14:23 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-004731, captured July 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Not the current version. The document's current version is CA-V-007645, captured Oct. 16, 2026; this clause has not been re-checked against it.
Citation Record
Entity: Baseten
Document: Baseten Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-073841
Version: CA-V-004731
Captured: 2026-07-11 13:43:40 UTC
SHA-256: fc18edee23c4c990…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/baseten/baseten-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-073841/customer-may-object-to-new-sub-processor-within-5-days/
Accessed: Oct. 24, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Baseten's Customer May Object to New Sub-Processor Within 5 Days clause do?

The clause states: “Customer may object in writing to Baseten's appointment of a new Sub-Processor based on reasonable data protection concerns by emailing privacy@baseten.co within five (5) calendar days of notice of the new Sub-Processor...”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 277 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Baseten?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Baseten.