This analysis describes what Baseten's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
If you are a California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah or Virginia resident, please also see the California and Other State Notice...
If the Receiving Party is required by law to disclose Confidential Information of the Disclosing Party, the Receiving Party will give prompt written notice to the Disclosing Party before making the disclosure, unless prohibited from doing so by legal or administrative process...
as such disclosure may be required by the order or requirement of a court, administrative agency or other governmental body, subject to the Receiving Party providing to the Disclosing Party reasonable written notice...
"Baseten shall notify Customer if it engages a new Sub-Processor at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date on which the new Sub-Processor will commence processing Customer Personal Data...Excerpt from Baseten's Terms of Service
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “Baseten shall notify Customer if it engages a new Sub-Processor at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date on which the new Sub-Processor will commence processing Customer Personal Data...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Baseten.