AWS Bedrock · AWS Service Terms · View original document ↗

Prohibition on Circumventing Safety and Content Restrictions

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 325 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for AWS Bedrock Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

You are not allowed to try to bypass or disable the safety features and content filters that AWS and model providers have built into Bedrock models.

This analysis describes what AWS Bedrock's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The terms impose an explicit obligation on customers not to attempt to circumvent model safety mechanisms, which applies to prompt engineering techniques, fine-tuning approaches, or system prompt configurations designed to override content policies.

Interpretive note: The boundary between permitted system prompt customization and prohibited safety circumvention is not precisely defined in the document text, creating interpretive uncertainty for advanced use cases.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium May 9, 2026

This change introduces a new optional service feature rather than modifying existing consumer rights or obligations. AWS explicitly disclaims providing regulated financial services, holding custody o…

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Customers using Bedrock must ensure that their prompt engineering, system prompt design, and fine-tuning workflows do not attempt to override safety mechanisms or content filters, as these activities are prohibited under the service terms regardless of the intended use case.

How other platforms handle this

Perplexity AI Medium

You may not use the Services to attempt to circumvent, disable, or otherwise interfere with safety-related features of the Services, including features that prevent or restrict the generation of certain types of content.

Runway Medium

You may not use Runway's tools to create content that promotes, glorifies, or facilitates acts of terrorism, mass violence, or genocide, or that could be used to provide material support to individuals or organizations engaged in such activities.

Midjourney Medium

Do not generate images for political campaigns or to try to influence the outcome of an election. Do not generate images to spread misinformation or disinformation. Do not generate images to attempt to or to actually deceive or defraud anyone. Do not intentionally mislead recipients of generated ima...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

AWS Bedrock has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.

Start Watcher free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You must not attempt to disable, circumvent, or otherwise undermine safety mechanisms, content filters, or use policies built into the models or the Service.

— Excerpt from AWS Bedrock's AWS Service Terms

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This prohibition aligns with requirements under the EU AI Act for deployers of AI systems to maintain and not undermine safety measures, and with FTC guidance on AI safety practices. Non-compliance with this clause could also implicate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in the US context depending on the method used to circumvent safety mechanisms, though legal applicability would depend on the specific technique and jurisdiction. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The clause is broadly worded and the boundary between legitimate prompt engineering for specialized use cases and prohibited circumvention attempts is not precisely defined in the document, creating interpretive uncertainty for advanced enterprise users with legitimate specialized requirements. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU customers face heightened exposure under the EU AI Act's safety obligations for AI deployers. The restriction applies globally to all Bedrock customers. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations providing Bedrock-based services to their own customers should include downstream use restrictions in their own terms of service to avoid facilitating end-user circumvention attempts that could constitute a breach of the AWS Service Terms. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: AI governance teams should establish internal policies distinguishing permitted system prompt customization from prohibited safety mechanism circumvention, and conduct legal review of any fine-tuning or model customization workflows that modify model behavior to ensure compliance with this provision.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Watcher free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has enforcement authority over AI safety practices and unfair or deceptive conduct involving AI systems where circumvention of safety mechanisms results in consumer harm.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

CFAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
AWS Service Terms
Entity
AWS Bedrock
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 12, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-011414
Document ID
CA-D-00648
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
880a4da359a0dff037c3d51956decd29ac6fa13b72df323303ce916dc8798c62
Analysis generated
May 12, 2026 09:51 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: AWS Bedrock
Document: AWS Service Terms
Record ID: CA-P-011414
Captured: 2026-05-12 09:51:22 UTC
SHA-256: 880a4da359a0dff0…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/aws-bedrock/aws-service-terms/prohibition-on-circumventing-safety-and-content-restrictions/
Accessed: May 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Professional Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Professional free trial

Or start with Watcher →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does AWS Bedrock's Prohibition on Circumventing Safety and Content Restrictions clause do?

The terms impose an explicit obligation on customers not to attempt to circumvent model safety mechanisms, which applies to prompt engineering techniques, fine-tuning approaches, or system prompt configurations designed to override content policies.

How does this clause affect you?

Customers using Bedrock must ensure that their prompt engineering, system prompt design, and fine-tuning workflows do not attempt to override safety mechanisms or content filters, as these activities are prohibited under the service terms regardless of the intended use case.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with AWS Bedrock?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AWS Bedrock.