Provision record
AWS Bedrock · AWS Service Terms · View original document ↗

HIPAA BAA Feature-Specific Eligibility Limitation

High severity Common · 142 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track AWS Bedrock and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

If you handle medical or health data, not all of Bedrock's AI features are approved for that use — you must check AWS's specific approved list before processing any health information through Bedrock.

This analysis describes what AWS Bedrock's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision creates a feature-level compliance boundary within a single service offering. Organizations subject to HIPAA must verify feature eligibility before using Bedrock to handle PHI, as non-eligible features lack BAA protections and therefore cannot lawfully process PHI under HIPAA requirements.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jul 30, 2026

The updated terms now explicitly state that AWS IoT SiteWise Scenario Discovery is not designed for real-time vehicle control and cannot be used as the sole basis for determining vehicle safety or regulatory compliance. Organizations deploying this service must implement independent human monitoring and safety validation before using its outputs to support vehicle system decisions. The terms make clear that AWS assumes no responsibility for uses that violate these constraints.

View change record →
Medium Jul 18, 2026

The updated terms establish new restrictions on how AWS Capacity Reservations may be used. Specifically, customers purchasing On-Demand Capacity Reservations can no longer resell them to other parties, and AWS reserves the right to cancel the purchase or terminate running instances if the company suspects resale activity. For Capacity Blocks for ML, the grace period before instance termination increased from 30 minutes to 60 minutes for UltraServer instance types, allowing slightly more time to complete workloads. The Amazon Sidewalk qualification program was renamed and simplified, but the underlying security and operational requirements remain in effect.

View change record →
Medium Jun 30, 2026

The updated terms establish a formal framework for AWS Bedrock's free exploration services, clarifying the operational boundaries and responsibilities. AWS reserves the right to discontinue these services at any time without prior notice, meaning customers cannot rely on their continuation for production planning. Customers are solely responsible for testing, deploying, and maintaining any code, documents, or AI solutions AWS provides, including determining whether those solutions comply with applicable law. AWS retains the right to develop competing products based on content it creates during these engagements, though this does not override existing non-disclosure agreements. Customers are prohibited from requiring AWS personnel to sign additional terms as a condition of receiving free services, and any such documentation signed by AWS personnel is void.

View change record →

Clause Stability Mostly Stable

1
Change
3
Months Monitored
May 7, 2026
First Seen
May 7, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 351 other provisions on other platforms.
This clause has changed once in 3 months of monitoring.

Change history

removed May 11, 2026

Removal of this provision eliminates explicit guidance on HIPAA BAA eligibility for different Bedrock features, potentially shifting compliance responsibility entirely to customers to research AWS documentation.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Healthcare businesses using unapproved Bedrock features to process patient health data face HIPAA enforcement exposure, which can result in significant financial penalties and reputational harm — with the risk borne entirely by the customer, not AWS.

How other platforms handle this

Tinder Medium

In assessing misuse, we consider factors such as evidence that a report was motivated by bias or hatred (e.g., based on protected characteristics such as race, sexual orientation, or gender identity) or other malicious intent.

Mailchimp Medium

We review account behavior and content that Members create, send, and publish in Mailchimp, including Campaigns and Websites.

Glassdoor Medium

We allow Content that names individuals in the highest positions in a company who have broad influence over the work environment, as long as the Content describes the individual's behavior or performance at work.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Not all Amazon Bedrock features are covered under the AWS Business Associate Addendum. You should review the AWS HIPAA eligible services list to determine which Amazon Bedrock features may be used to process Protected Health Information.

Excerpt from AWS Bedrock's AWS Service Terms

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: This provision directly implicates HIPAA 45 CFR Parts 160 and 164 (Privacy and Security Rules), the HITECH Act (42 U.S.C.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Department Of Health & Human Services, Office For Civil Rights (hhs Ocr)
    Enforces HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules, which protect health information held by healthcare providers, health plans, and their business associates.
    Who can file: Anyone whose HIPAA rights may have been violated by a covered entity (healthcare provider, health plan, or healthcare clearinghouse)
    What you need: Name of the entity, description of the violation, date of the incident, and your contact information. Must file within 180 days of the violation.
    What to expect: HHS OCR investigates and may require the entity to take corrective action. Does not provide individual compensation. Serious violations can result in civil monetary penalties.
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
AWS Service Terms
Entity
AWS Bedrock
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 7, 2026
Last verified
May 7, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-005321
Document ID
CA-D-00648
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
8c96717daae1f374f3c175da7b75c1eeb2b3852949018350a8af38b245c1ef17
Analysis generated
May 7, 2026 18:28 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: AWS Bedrock
Document: AWS Service Terms
Record ID: CA-P-005321
Captured: 2026-05-07 18:28:56 UTC
SHA-256: 8c96717daae1f374…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/aws-bedrock/aws-service-terms/provision/CA-P-005321/hipaa-baa-feature-specific-eligibility-limitation/
Accessed: Aug. 12, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does AWS Bedrock's HIPAA BAA Feature-Specific Eligibility Limitation clause do?

This provision creates a feature-level compliance boundary within a single service offering. Organizations subject to HIPAA must verify feature eligibility before using Bedrock to handle PHI, as non-eligible features lack BAA protections and therefore cannot lawfully process PHI under HIPAA requirements.

How does this clause affect you?

Healthcare businesses using unapproved Bedrock features to process patient health data face HIPAA enforcement exposure, which can result in significant financial penalties and reputational harm — with the risk borne entirely by the customer, not AWS.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 142 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with AWS Bedrock?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AWS Bedrock.