Apple · Apple App Store Review Guidelines

Mandatory In-App Purchase Requirement

High severity
Share 𝕏 Share in Share

What it is

If an app sells digital content — like subscriptions, games, or extra features — it must use Apple's own payment system, and cannot send you to a cheaper website to buy the same thing.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

This provision means consumers may pay more for digital subscriptions and in-app purchases because Apple's 30% commission is typically built into the price; it also prevents developers from showing you a cheaper external price.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Mandatory In-App Purchase Requirement and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →
Need full compliance memos? See Professional →

Why it matters (compliance & risk perspective)

Apple takes up to 30% of every digital purchase made through its payment system, a cost developers often pass on to consumers through higher prices.

View original clause language
Apps may not use their own mechanisms to unlock content or functionality, such as license keys, augmented reality markers, QR codes, cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency wallets, and so on. Apps and their metadata may not include buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms other than in-app purchase.

Institutional analysis (Compliance & legal intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: This provision directly implicates the EU Digital Markets Act (DMA, Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, Arts. 5(7) and 6(12)), which requires Apple as a gatekeeper to allow third-party payment processors and prohibits anti-steering obligations in the EU. It also engages FTC Act Section 5 (15 U.S.C. §45) regarding unfair methods of competition, and is at the center of DOJ v. Apple Inc. (D.N.J. 2024) antitrust proceedings. In the US, Epic Games v. Apple (9th Cir. 2023) addressed anti-steering specifically. Enforcement authorities include the European Commission (DG COMP), DOJ Antitrust Division, FTC, and state AGs. (2)

🔒

Compliance intelligence locked

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Watcher $9.99/mo Professional $149/mo

Watcher: regulatory citations. Professional: full compliance memo.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The mandatory IAP requirement and anti-steering prohibition implicate FTC Act Section 5 unfair competition authority and are subject to ongoing FTC scrutiny of Apple's App Store practices.
    File a complaint →
  • State AG
    State AGs, particularly California (UCL/Cartwright Act), have jurisdiction over anti-competitive pricing and anti-steering practices affecting consumers in their states.
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
Apple App Store Review Guidelines
Entity
Apple
Document last updated
March 24, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
April 28, 2026
Last verified
April 28, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-003882
Document ID
CA-D-00025
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
SHA-256
307db15d06f03003277f88a1476a1308e92cc7cba75906b4fac341d1054f5040
Verified
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Change verified
How to Cite
ConductAtlas Policy Archive
Entity: Apple | Document: Apple App Store Review Guidelines | Record: CA-P-003882
Captured: 2026-04-28 08:36:55 UTC | SHA-256: 307db15d06f03003…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/apple/apple-app-store-review-guidelines/mandatory-in-app-purchase-requirement/
Accessed: April 29, 2026
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other provisions in this document