Provision record
ActiveCampaign · ActiveCampaign Acceptable Use Policy · View original document ↗

Sole-judgment objectionable content prohibition

Common · 250 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track ActiveCampaign and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what ActiveCampaign's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Impact

upload, post, transmit, share, store or otherwise make available content that, in the sole judgment of Impact, is objectionable or which restricts or inhibits any other person from using or enjoying...

Kling AI

material that, in our sole judgment of us, is objectionable or which restricts or inhibits any other person from using the Services, or which may expose Kling AI...to any harm or liability of any type.

Ro

Ro reserves the right to remove any content or any other material or information available on or through our Services, at any time, for any reason.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Is, in our sole judgment, objectionable or that restricts or inhibits any other person from using or enjoying his or her device or email or other communications service...

Excerpt from ActiveCampaign's Acceptable Use Policy

Provision details

Document information
Document
ActiveCampaign Acceptable Use Policy
Entity
ActiveCampaign
Date stated by the document
March 1, 2022
As printed in ActiveCampaign’s text (version CA-V-004757), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
July 11, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-004757, captured July 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-074143
Document ID
CA-D-000893
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-004757)
1b72ba5f3538d8126cf87173dd9e570a542abb9aff2b9b8efc03cb8e3fa0fa2a
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 17:14 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-004757, captured July 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: ActiveCampaign
Document: ActiveCampaign Acceptable Use Policy
Record ID: CA-P-074143
Version: CA-V-004757
Captured: 2026-07-11 13:46:19 UTC
SHA-256: 1b72ba5f3538d812…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/activecampaign/activecampaign-acceptable-use-policy/provision/CA-P-074143/sole-judgment-objectionable-content-prohibition/
Accessed: Nov. 3, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does ActiveCampaign's Sole-judgment objectionable content prohibition clause do?

The clause states: “Is, in our sole judgment, objectionable or that restricts or inhibits any other person from using or enjoying his or her device or email or other communications service...”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 250 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with ActiveCampaign?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ActiveCampaign.