ActiveCampaign · ActiveCampaign Acceptable Use Policy · View original document ↗

Customer Opt-In Verification and Consent Responsibility

Medium severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time ActiveCampaign changes these terms. Get same-day alerts →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for ActiveCampaign Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Get same-day alerts →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

Document Record

What it is

The policy requires customers to independently verify opt-in consent for every marketing message recipient and explicitly prohibits using business card contacts as a valid consent mechanism.

This analysis describes what ActiveCampaign's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision places affirmative opt-in verification obligations on customers, aligning with TCPA, CAN-SPAM, and CASL requirements, and establishes that failure to comply exposes customers to account suspension and carrier or regulatory penalties rather than creating any ActiveCampaign compliance obligation.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

This provision establishes that customers bear full responsibility for verifying recipient consent before sending marketing messages through the platform. The agreement specifies that business card collection does not constitute valid opt-in, and customers who cannot verify consent for any contact are prohibited from messaging that contact.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Customer Opt-In Verification and Consent Responsibility and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Monitoring

ActiveCampaign has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You must be able to verify each contact to whom you intend to send marketing messages. You must ensure that all message recipients have fully opted-in to receive marketing messages from you. Please note that simply getting someone's business card is not an acceptable opt-in and you cannot send messages to email addresses or phone numbers you obtained from business cards.

Excerpt from ActiveCampaign's Acceptable Use Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision directly engages TCPA (FCC-administered), CAN-SPAM (FTC-administered), and CASL (CRTC-administered) consent requirements. Under TCPA, prior express written consent is required for autodialed or prerecorded messages to mobile numbers, and violations can result in statutory damages of $500 to $1,500 per message. CAN-SPAM and CASL impose similar opt-in and opt-out requirements for email marketing. The policy places the compliance burden entirely on the customer. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High for customers who have not implemented documented consent collection workflows. The provision's explicit exclusion of business card contacts as valid opt-in is operationally specific and could affect customers with legacy contact lists built through in-person networking or trade shows. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU customers are also subject to GDPR Article 6 and Article 7 consent requirements for marketing communications, which require freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous consent. Canada's CASL imposes express or implied consent requirements with specific disclosure obligations. Heightened exposure exists for customers marketing across multiple jurisdictions without jurisdiction-specific consent tracking. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: B2B customers integrating ActiveCampaign with CRM or lead generation platforms should assess whether their data intake workflows produce consent records that satisfy the policy's opt-in verification standard. Vendor assessments should include review of whether third-party data providers can document compliant opt-in status for all transferred contacts. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Customers should implement and document consent collection workflows that produce verifiable opt-in records for each contact, including the method, date, and scope of consent. Legal teams should assess whether existing contact databases satisfy the policy's verification standard and whether retroactive consent validation is required before import.

Full institutional analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Get same-day alerts when this changes → Get Analyst

Monitor: same-day alerts on the platforms you choose. Analyst: full institutional analysis.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC administers CAN-SPAM Act enforcement and has authority over unsolicited commercial email practices
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
ActiveCampaign Acceptable Use Policy
Entity
ActiveCampaign
Document last updated
May 20, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 12, 2026
Last verified
July 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-074497
Document ID
CA-D-00893
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
42558aa39b70f025e60c424d4fb1c133b09cf3ce730681f981fc1c048dfe773d
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 17:14 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: ActiveCampaign
Document: ActiveCampaign Acceptable Use Policy
Record ID: CA-P-074497
Captured: 2026-07-12 17:14:53 UTC
SHA-256: 42558aa39b70f025…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/activecampaign/activecampaign-acceptable-use-policy/provision/CA-P-074497/customer-opt-in-verification-and-consent-responsibility/
Accessed: July 23, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Get Compliance

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does ActiveCampaign's Customer Opt-In Verification and Consent Responsibility clause do?

This provision places affirmative opt-in verification obligations on customers, aligning with TCPA, CAN-SPAM, and CASL requirements, and establishes that failure to comply exposes customers to account suspension and carrier or regulatory penalties rather than creating any ActiveCampaign compliance obligation.

How does this clause affect you?

This provision establishes that customers bear full responsibility for verifying recipient consent before sending marketing messages through the platform. The agreement specifies that business card collection does not constitute valid opt-in, and customers who cannot verify consent for any contact are prohibited from messaging that contact.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with ActiveCampaign?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ActiveCampaign.