This analysis describes what 23andMe's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The operational significance is that this provision changes the procedural framework for dispute resolution from court-based adjudication to private arbitration, which alters how disputes are evaluated, decided, and appealed, and establishes that claims must proceed on an individual rather than collective basis.
Users operating under these terms are required to pursue disputes through individual binding arbitration, meaning any claims against 23andMe must follow the arbitration process rather than litigation in court, and users waive participation in class action or collective proceedings for resolving disputes.
How other platforms handle this
the arbitration provider, National Arbitration and Mediation ("NAM"), shall not accept or administer any demand for arbitration and shall administratively close any arbitration unless the Party bringing such demand for arbitration can certify in writing that the terms...were fully satisfied.
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
either party retains the right to bring an individual action in small claims court, if the claims qualify, so long as the matter remains in such court and advances only on an individual (non-class, non-representative) basis.
"THESE TERMS OF SERVICE CONTAIN A MANDATORY ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES PROVISION THAT REQUIRES THE USE OF ARBITRATION ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS TO RESOLVE DISPUTES IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, RATHER THAN JURY TRIALS OR CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS.Excerpt from 23andMe's Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The operational significance is that this provision changes the procedural framework for dispute resolution from court-based adjudication to private arbitration, which alters how disputes are evaluated, decided, and appealed, and establishes that claims must proceed on an individual rather than collective basis.
Users operating under these terms are required to pursue disputes through individual binding arbitration, meaning any claims against 23andMe must follow the arbitration process rather than litigation in court, and users waive participation in class action or collective proceedings for resolving disputes.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 206 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by 23andMe.