Compare security governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
The clause allocates security obligations and liability risk to the account holder rather than the service provider, establishing that GitHub's liability for account compromise or unauthorized activity is excluded by contract terms.
Consumer impact
Users are required to maintain account security and assume responsibility for all activity and content posted under their account, including activity by other users with access to the account. The terms specify that GitHub will not provide compensation for losses arising from security breaches caused by user negligence.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
You are responsible for maintaining the security of your account and password. GitHub cannot and will not be liable for any loss or damage from your failure to comply with this security obligation. You are responsible for all content posted and activity that occurs under your account (even when content is posted by others who have accounts under your account).
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Security clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisProfessional
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.