ConductAtlas › Compare › Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries
Cross-platform comparison

Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries, Cross-Platform Comparison

245 platforms tracked · 1778 provisions · 230 platforms high severity · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

245
Platforms
230
High severity
110
Medium
18
Low
352
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing GitHub vs Cursor · Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare restricted or prohibited content/industries governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.

developer_tools GitHub Prohibition on supporting active malware campaigns
High
What it means
The prohibition requires that the campaign be both unlawful and actively causing technical harms; content that merely relates to such campaigns without directly supporting them may not be covered by this clause.
Consumer impact
You are prohibited from hosting content on GitHub that directly supports unlawful active attack or malware campaigns that are causing technical harms.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
directly supports unlawful active attack or malware campaigns that are causing technical harms — such as using our platform to deliver malicious executables or as attack infrastructure...
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
CA-P-060824
Recent changes
Aug 7, 2026 Unknown

GitHub added 'Opens in new tab' link annotations to several URLs and references in their GitHub Cop…

GitHub's Privacy Statement was detected with a formatting change on July 16, 2026. The table of con…

Cursor
No Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis when any tracked platform updates this provision.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Browse by provision type
Account Control Content Moderation Acceptable Use Restrictions Payment & Fees Refunds & Chargebacks Data Collection Data Usage Data Sharing Data Retention Privacy Rights Arbitration Legal Jurisdiction Liability Limitation Indemnification Platform Discretion Policy Changes Enforcement Actions Monetization Rules Developer / API Restrictions AI / Automated Decision-Making Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries Disclosure and Transparency Requirements Targeting and Audience Restrictions Commission, Payout, and Attribution Terms Landing Page and Destination Requirements Intellectual Property General Contract Terms Export Controls & Sanctions Other