1243
Platforms
201
High severity
824
Medium
218
Low
325
Total monitored
Track privacy rights changes Get alerts when any platform updates their privacy rights clause.
Track changes — Professional
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing GitHub vs Cursor · Privacy Rights provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare privacy rights governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.

The clause operationalizes CCPA/CPRA statutory rights by specifying the mechanism through which California residents may exercise opt-out authority over data sales and sharing practices, establishing GitHub's procedural obligation to receive and process such requests.
California residents may submit opt-out requests to restrict GitHub's sale or sharing of their personal information using designated channels. The availability of this mechanism applies to residents who affirmatively elect to submit such requests.
No opt-out available
If you are a California resident, you have the right to opt out of the sale or sharing of your personal information. You may submit a request to opt out of the sale or sharing of your personal information by visiting our privacy settings or contacting us through our privacy request portal.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.

GitHub updated its Copilot Business Privacy Statement on May 13, 2026 by adding compliance document…

GitHub updated its Privacy Statement on April 28, 2026 to explicitly authorize collection and use o…

Apr 28, 2026 Medium

GitHub added a new section titled 'AI Features, Training, and Your Data' to its Terms of Service on…

This clause defines the operational scope of model training practices by establishing default non-use of user-generated content for training purposes and creating exceptions only for security analysis, user-initiated feedback, or affirmative consent. The provision creates an opt-in framework rather than opt-out, which affects data handling procedures and third-party data sharing policies.
Users' inputs and suggestions are not used for model training absent one of the three specified exceptions or user preference changes. The terms authorize management of training preferences through service controls, permitting users to modify the default restriction if desired.
No opt-out available
We do not use Inputs or Suggestions to train our models, or permit third parties to use them for training, unless: (1) they are flagged for security review (in which case we may analyze them to improve our ability to detect and enforce our Terms of Service), (2) you explicitly report them to us (for example, as Feedback), or (3) you've explicitly agreed to their use for such training purposes. You can find instructions in the Service on how to manage your preferences regarding the use of Inputs and Suggestions for training.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
AI Difference Analysis Professional
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.

Don't miss the next privacy rights change.

1243 platforms have this clause. Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis when any of them update it.

Professional — $149/mo Watcher — $9.99/mo

1243 platforms have privacy rights clauses.

Get same-day alerts when any of them change — with full clause analysis and audit trails.

Get full analysis — Professional
Browse by provision type