Cross-platform comparison

Privacy Rights, Cross-Platform Comparison

290 platforms tracked · 5149 provisions · 229 platforms high severity · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

290
Platforms
229
High severity
277
Medium
223
Low
352
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing GitHub vs Cursor · Privacy Rights provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare privacy rights governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.

No summary available.
No opt-out available
You reserve the right to request the deletion of your data, barring a few exceptions. Such exceptions include circumstances where we are required to retain data to comply with legal obligations, detect fraudulent activity...
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
Aug 7, 2026 Unknown

GitHub added 'Opens in new tab' link annotations to several URLs and references in their GitHub Cop…

GitHub's Privacy Statement was detected with a formatting change on July 16, 2026. The table of con…

This provision places contractual responsibility on users to ensure they do not input regulated data types such as medical records or financial account information into Cursor, which is significant for enterprise users and developers working with sensitive data.
Under this provision, users who submit HIPAA-regulated health information, PCI-DSS payment card data, or GLBA-regulated financial data to the Service are in breach of these Terms; enterprise teams integrating Cursor into development workflows involving such data categories should establish technical controls to prevent prohibited submissions.
No opt-out available
you may not:... (x) send or otherwise provide to Anysphere data or information that is subject to specific protections under applicable laws beyond any requirements that apply to "personal information" or "personal data" generally, such as for illustrative purposes, information that is regulated by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and other U.S. federal, state or foreign laws applying specific security standards
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.

Cursor removed the word 'indexing' from its description of backend functionality in an update detec…

Aug 29, 2026 Medium

Cursor removed two sentences from its Data Use & Privacy Overview that previously described how cod…

Cursor expanded its security certifications section in an update detected on August 27, 2026. Previ…

AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis when any tracked platform updates this provision.

Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform.

Browse by provision type