Compare policy changes governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which policy changes become binding on users without requiring affirmative consent or negotiation. It operationalizes a unilateral amendment framework where the policy terms are treated as accepted through passive conduct.
Consumer impact
Users operate under privacy terms that may change at any time through publication only, with no requirement for explicit acknowledgment or opt-in. Continued access to the service constitutes acceptance of modified terms, meaning users cannot maintain the original policy terms while continuing service use.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
We may update this Privacy Policy from time to time. When we do, we will publish an updated version and effective date at the top of this page, unless another type of notice is legally required. Your continued use of this site after any change in this Privacy Policy will constitute your acceptance of such change.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.