Compare platform discretion governance provisions between OpenAI and Google-Gemini. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
This license authorizes OpenAI to use the content of user conversations, including potentially sensitive or proprietary information submitted as inputs, for purposes including service improvement, which may have implications for users submitting confidential business or personal information.
Consumer impact
The agreement grants OpenAI a royalty-free worldwide license to use inputs (prompts) and outputs (AI responses) for purposes including improving the services; users who submit confidential, proprietary, or sensitive personal information should review OpenAI's Privacy Policy and any applicable API data processing agreements to understand how this license interacts with data handling obligations.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
By using our Services, you grant OpenAI a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use, copy, modify, distribute, and create derivative works from your inputs and outputs, including to provide, maintain, improve, and develop the Services and to comply with applicable law.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Platform Discretion clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisCompliance
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.