647
Platforms
117
High severity
417
Medium
113
Low
352
Total monitored
Track platform discretion changes Get alerts when any platform updates their platform discretion clause.
Track changes — Compliance
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing GitHub vs Cursor · Platform Discretion provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare platform discretion governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.

The provision authorizes GitHub to display and reproduce your public repository content and grants other users a license to fork and view it, which is central to how GitHub's collaborative platform functions but also means public content can be used by others within the service.
Content posted to public repositories is licensed to GitHub and to all other GitHub users for display, forking, and reproduction on the platform. Developers hosting proprietary or sensitive code should ensure repositories are set to private to limit the scope of this license.
No opt-out available
By setting your pages and repositories to be viewed publicly, you agree to allow others to view and fork your repositories within the GitHub Service. By setting your repositories to be viewed publicly, you agree to allow GitHub to display your User Content in ways to enable users to view, fork, and download your repositories. If you set your pages and repositories to be viewed publicly, you grant each User of GitHub a nonexclusive, worldwide license to use, display, and perform your Content through the GitHub Service and to reproduce your Content solely on GitHub as permitted through GitHub's functionality. You may grant further rights if you adopt a license.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
Jun 24, 2026 Unknown

GitHub updated its GitHub Copilot Business Privacy Statement on June 21, 2026 by adding a date rang…

GitHub updated its Copilot Business Privacy Statement on May 13, 2026 by adding compliance document…

This provision grants Anysphere an unrestricted, royalty-free license to use any user-provided feedback about the Service, which is a standard clause in software agreements but means users have no claim to compensation or attribution for ideas that are incorporated into the product.
Users who submit feedback, suggestions, or improvement ideas to Anysphere grant the company the right to use that feedback without restriction or compensation; this applies to informal communications such as support tickets or forum posts that constitute feedback about the Service.
No opt-out available
We appreciate the thoughts and comments from our users. If you choose to provide input and suggestions regarding existing functionalities, problems with or proposed modifications or improvements to the Service ("Feedback"), then you grant Anysphere the right to exploit the Feedback without restriction or compensation to you.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
Jun 10, 2026 Unknown
Jun 10, 2026 Unknown
AI Difference Analysis Compliance
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.

Don't miss the next platform discretion change.

647 platforms have this clause. Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis when any of them update it.

Compliance — $249/mo Monitor — $19/mo

647 platforms have platform discretion clauses.

Get same-day alerts when any of them change — with full clause analysis and audit trails.

Get full analysis — Compliance
Browse by provision type