ConductAtlas › Compare › Legal Jurisdiction
Cross-platform comparison

Legal Jurisdiction, Cross-Platform Comparison

264 platforms tracked · 1375 provisions · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

264
Platforms
343
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing GitHub vs Cursor · Legal Jurisdiction provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare legal jurisdiction governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents.

developer_tools GitHub Governing Law California and Federal United States
What it means
No summary available.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
This Agreement between you and GitHub and any access to or use of the Website or the Service are governed by the federal laws of the United States of America and the laws of the State of California...
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
CA-P-036498
Recent changes
Apr 28, 2026 Medium

GitHub added a new section titled 'AI Features, Training, and Your Data' to its Terms of Service, e…

ai Cursor EEA User Data Transfer Requirement
What it means
No summary available.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
when you access our Service, your personal data may be transferred to our United States servers to other countries outside the EEA and the UK. Where information is transferred outside the EEA or the UK, we require an adequate level of data protection.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
CA-P-043568
Recent changes
Oct 12, 2026 Medium

Cursor updated its Privacy Policy date from September 29, 2026 to October 11, 2026. The policy also…

Oct 1, 2026 Medium

Cursor's Privacy Policy removed its explicit statement that it does not 'sell' or 'share' personal …

Cursor removed the word 'indexing' from its description of backend functionality. The previous text…

AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get alerts and full clause analysis when a tracked platform updates this provision. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Browse by provision type
Account Control Content Moderation Acceptable Use Restrictions Payment & Fees Refunds & Chargebacks Data Collection Data Usage Data Sharing Data Retention Privacy Rights Arbitration Legal Jurisdiction Liability Limitation Indemnification Platform Discretion Policy Changes Enforcement Actions Monetization Rules Developer / API Restrictions AI / Automated Decision-Making Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries Disclosure and Transparency Requirements Targeting and Audience Restrictions Commission, Payout, and Attribution Terms Landing Page and Destination Requirements Intellectual Property General Contract Terms Export Controls & Sanctions Other