Compare intellectual property governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
The clause establishes the operational scope of GitHub's content handling authority when repositories are set to public visibility, defining what technical and display functions GitHub may perform with that content as part of service delivery and platform operations.
Consumer impact
Users who set repositories to public status authorize GitHub to store, copy, parse, and display their content within search results and across the platform network. The terms specify that users grant these rights to GitHub and its successors as a condition of public repository access.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
By setting your repositories to be viewed publicly, you agree to allow others to view and "fork" your repositories. By setting your pages and repositories to be viewed publicly, you agree to allow GitHub to display your profile and repository content in search results and to otherwise make it available to users of the GitHub network and the public. You grant us and our legal successors the right to store, archive, parse, and display Your Content, and make incidental copies, as necessary to provide the Service, including improving the Service over time.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Intellectual Property clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisProfessional
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.