ConductAtlas › Compare › Enforcement Actions
Cross-platform comparison

Enforcement Actions, Cross-Platform Comparison

277 platforms tracked · 1874 provisions · 270 platforms high severity · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

277
Platforms
270
High severity
192
Medium
12
Low
352
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing GitHub vs Cursor · Enforcement Actions provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare enforcement actions governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.

developer_tools GitHub GitHub may suspend account for excessive bandwidth
High
What it means
This clause gives GitHub discretion to take enforcement action—including full account suspension—based on relative bandwidth consumption, without requiring an absolute usage threshold.
Consumer impact
If GitHub determines your bandwidth usage is significantly excessive relative to similar users, your account may be suspended or your file hosting may be throttled.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
If we determine your bandwidth usage to be significantly excessive in relation to other users of similar features, we reserve the right to suspend your Account, throttle your file hosting...
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
CA-P-060836
Recent changes
Aug 7, 2026 Unknown

GitHub added 'Opens in new tab' link annotations to several URLs and references in their GitHub Cop…

GitHub's Privacy Statement was detected with a formatting change on July 16, 2026. The table of con…

Cursor
No Enforcement Actions clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis when any tracked platform updates this provision.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Browse by provision type
Account Control Content Moderation Acceptable Use Restrictions Payment & Fees Refunds & Chargebacks Data Collection Data Usage Data Sharing Data Retention Privacy Rights Arbitration Legal Jurisdiction Liability Limitation Indemnification Platform Discretion Policy Changes Enforcement Actions Monetization Rules Developer / API Restrictions AI / Automated Decision-Making Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries Disclosure and Transparency Requirements Targeting and Audience Restrictions Commission, Payout, and Attribution Terms Landing Page and Destination Requirements Intellectual Property General Contract Terms Export Controls & Sanctions Other