Compare enforcement actions governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
The account responsibility clause assigns liability for all account activity to the account holder, including unauthorized access by third parties, which means users may be held responsible for policy violations or content posted by others who gained access to their account.
Consumer impact
All activity under your GitHub account is your responsibility under these terms, even if your account is accessed without your permission by a third party. Enabling two-factor authentication and monitoring account activity are the primary ways to reduce exposure under this provision.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
You are responsible for maintaining the security of your account and password. GitHub cannot and will not be liable for any loss or damage from your failure to comply with this security obligation. You are responsible for all content posted and activity that occurs under your account (even when content is posted by others who have access to your account). You may not use another User's account without permission.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Enforcement Actions clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisCompliance
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.