Cross-platform comparison

Data Usage, Cross-Platform Comparison

279 platforms tracked · 3334 provisions · 240 platforms high severity · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

279
Platforms
240
High severity
264
Medium
196
Low
352
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing GitHub vs Cursor · Data Usage provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare data usage governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.

No summary available.
No opt-out available
For the avoidance of doubt, use of Your Content to develop, train, and improve artificial intelligence and machine learning models and technologies of GitHub and our Affiliates is within the scope of this license and does not constitute a sale...
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
Aug 7, 2026 Unknown

GitHub added 'Opens in new tab' link annotations to several URLs and references in their GitHub Cop…

GitHub's Privacy Statement was detected with a formatting change on July 16, 2026. The table of con…

The default prohibition on training use of Inputs and Suggestions protects user content from being used to improve AI models, with narrowly defined exceptions.
By default, your Inputs and Suggestions will not be used by Cursor or third parties for model training, unless they are flagged for security review or you have explicitly agreed to such use.
No opt-out available
We do not use Inputs or Suggestions to train our models, or permit third parties to use them for training, unless: (1) they are flagged for security review...or (3) you've explicitly agreed to their use for such training purposes.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.

Cursor removed the word 'indexing' from its description of backend functionality in an update detec…

Aug 29, 2026 Medium

Cursor removed two sentences from its Data Use & Privacy Overview that previously described how cod…

Cursor expanded its security certifications section in an update detected on August 27, 2026. Previ…

AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis when any tracked platform updates this provision.

Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform.

Browse by provision type