Compare content moderation governance provisions between OpenAI and Google-Gemini. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
The clause establishes the scope of OpenAI's operational rights to process and utilize user content as part of service delivery and product development. This licensing structure permits OpenAI to incorporate user interactions into model training and service improvement without additional compensation or per-use licensing fees.
Consumer impact
Users grant OpenAI broad rights to use their inputs and outputs for service provision and improvement purposes, while retaining underlying ownership of the inputs themselves. The non-exclusive nature of the license permits OpenAI to use this content across multiple services and derivative applications.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
By using our Services, you provide us with information such as prompts, files, images, audio, and other inputs ('Input'), and receive outputs generated by our Services based on the Input ('Output'). As between you and OpenAI, and to the extent permitted by applicable law, you retain your ownership rights in Input. You grant OpenAI a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use, copy, store, transmit, modify, and create derivative works of your Input and Output to the extent necessary to provide and improve the Services.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Content Moderation clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisProfessional
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.