Compare ai / automated decision-making governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
This provision establishes the operational scope of data collection and processing activities associated with AI-powered features. It clarifies that improvement of AI systems is an authorized use case for personal data collected through these features.
Consumer impact
Users of GitHub Copilot and other AI-powered features operate under terms that authorize GitHub to process their usage data, interaction patterns, and submitted content for product improvement purposes. The provision requires users to consult product-specific terms for the full scope of data handling practices applicable to each AI feature.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
GitHub may use personal data to improve our products and services, including AI-powered features such as GitHub Copilot. Data used to improve AI features may include usage data, interaction data, and content provided to AI features. Users of AI-powered features should review applicable product-specific terms for additional details.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
The clause clarifies the operational scope of data collection within the Service's core functionality, establishing that personal data and external content references are treated as collectable Inputs rather than excluded categories, affecting what information flows through the suggestion generation process.
Consumer impact
Users who submit Inputs containing personal data or references to external content authorize Cursor to collect that information and incorporate it into Suggestions provided back to users. The terms apply as written upon submission of any Input containing such content.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
The Service allows you to submit content ("Inputs"), which generate responses ("Suggestions") based on your Inputs. If you include personal data or reference external content in your Inputs, we will collect that information and it may be reproduced in the Suggestions we provide.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.