Compare acceptable use restrictions governance provisions between Uber and DoorDash. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
The provision establishes DoorDash's control over derivative uses of platform data and content, requiring users and third parties to obtain explicit authorization before using the service for AI training, data aggregation, or automated collection purposes. This mechanism protects the platform's data and proprietary content from being used to develop competing services or train external systems.
Consumer impact
Users and third parties are contractually restricted from using DoorDash's platform or content for machine learning development, AI training, or automated data collection without obtaining prior written consent from DoorDash. Permitted uses are limited to standard consumer access of the service as designed.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
(g) You will not use or attempt to use the Services or content accessible through the Services without DoorDash's prior written consent in connection with the development of any software program, including, but not limited to, training a machine learning or artificial intelligence (AI) system or providing archived or cached data sets containing content accessible through the Services to another person or entity. (p) You will not use, access, or collect content, data, information, or materials published or available on the Services—including, but not limited to, text, photographs, images, illustrations, designs, audio clips, video clips, 'look and feel,' metadata, data, or compilations—using automated means unless DoorDash has given you prior permission to do so in writing.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
DoorDash removed the header line identifying the document's country and language jurisdiction (Coun…
AI Difference AnalysisProfessional
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.