Cross-platform comparison

Acceptable Use Restrictions, Cross-Platform Comparison

273 platforms tracked · 3909 provisions · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

273
Platforms
343
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing GitHub vs Cursor · Acceptable Use Restrictions provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare acceptable use restrictions governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents.

No summary available.
No opt-out available
impersonates any person or entity, including any of our employees or representatives, including through false association with GitHub, or by fraudulently misrepresenting your identity...
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
Apr 28, 2026 Medium

GitHub added a new section titled 'AI Features, Training, and Your Data' to its Terms of Service, e…

The restriction establishes a contractual boundary on data categories the service will process, allocating responsibility to users to identify and exclude regulated data streams before submission. This operates as a protective measure defining the scope of data Anysphere accepts under its stated security and compliance posture.
Users are required to independently identify and withhold submission of health information, payment card data, financial account information, and other data subject to industry-specific regulatory regimes before providing content to the service. Submitting such data in violation of this restriction constitutes a breach of the terms.
No opt-out available
you may not: ... (x) send or otherwise provide to Anysphere data or information that is subject to specific protections under applicable laws beyond any requirements that apply to "personal information" or "personal data" generally, such as for illustrative purposes, information that is regulated by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and other U.S. federal, state or foreign laws applying specific security standards
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
Oct 12, 2026 Medium

Cursor updated its Privacy Policy date from September 29, 2026 to October 11, 2026. The policy also…

Oct 1, 2026 Medium

Cursor's Privacy Policy removed its explicit statement that it does not 'sell' or 'share' personal …

Cursor removed the word 'indexing' from its description of backend functionality. The previous text…

AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get alerts and full clause analysis when a tracked platform updates this provision. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.

Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.

Browse by provision type