Compare acceptable use restrictions governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
This provision directly restricts the use of GitHub Actions and other compute resources for cryptomining or automated bulk operations, which is operationally significant for DevOps teams and organizations running automated pipelines that may inadvertently approach the boundary of this prohibition.
Consumer impact
Under this clause, any use of GitHub's server infrastructure for cryptocurrency mining or excessive automated bulk activity is prohibited and may result in content removal or account suspension. Organizations using GitHub Actions for compute-intensive workloads should evaluate their pipelines against this restriction.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
You may not use our servers for any form of excessive automated bulk activity (including, for example, sending spam or cryptocurrency mining), to place undue burden on our servers through automated means, or to relay any form of unsolicited advertising or solicitation through our systems.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
The restriction establishes a contractual boundary on data categories the service will process, allocating responsibility to users to identify and exclude regulated data streams before submission. This operates as a protective measure defining the scope of data Anysphere accepts under its stated security and compliance posture.
Consumer impact
Users are required to independently identify and withhold submission of health information, payment card data, financial account information, and other data subject to industry-specific regulatory regimes before providing content to the service. Submitting such data in violation of this restriction constitutes a breach of the terms.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
you may not: ... (x) send or otherwise provide to Anysphere data or information that is subject to specific protections under applicable laws beyond any requirements that apply to "personal information" or "personal data" generally, such as for illustrative purposes, information that is regulated by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and other U.S. federal, state or foreign laws applying specific security standards
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.