Compare acceptable use restrictions governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
This provision operationalizes GitHub's compliance with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and establishes a threshold eligibility requirement for account access. It delegates GitHub the authority to enforce age-based access controls through account termination.
Consumer impact
Users under 13 years old are not permitted to create accounts or access the service under the stated terms. Users who created accounts while under 13 should understand that GitHub's discovery of their age would result in immediate account termination without further notice.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
GitHub does not permit children under 13 years old to have an Account. GitHub does not direct our Service to children under 13, and we do not permit any Users under the age of 13 to access the Service. If we learn of any User under the age of 13, we will terminate that User's account immediately.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
The restriction establishes a contractual boundary on data categories the service will process, allocating responsibility to users to identify and exclude regulated data streams before submission. This operates as a protective measure defining the scope of data Anysphere accepts under its stated security and compliance posture.
Consumer impact
Users are required to independently identify and withhold submission of health information, payment card data, financial account information, and other data subject to industry-specific regulatory regimes before providing content to the service. Submitting such data in violation of this restriction constitutes a breach of the terms.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
you may not: ... (x) send or otherwise provide to Anysphere data or information that is subject to specific protections under applicable laws beyond any requirements that apply to "personal information" or "personal data" generally, such as for illustrative purposes, information that is regulated by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and other U.S. federal, state or foreign laws applying specific security standards
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.