Whatnot updated its Influencer Engagement Agreement (versions 5.2 to 6.0 for standard terms, 2.2 to 3.0 for Australian terms) effective June 23, 2026. The revised terms remove venue-specific dispute resolution and instead require all disputes to be resolved through arbitration under Whatnot's main Terms of Service, including mandatory arbitration and class action waiver provisions. Previously, influencers could pursue claims in California or Australian courts; under the updated language, disputes must proceed exclusively through arbitration except where the main Terms of Service expressly permit otherwise.
The updated terms establish mandatory arbitration as the exclusive dispute resolution mechanism for influencers, replacing direct court access in California and Australia. Under the revised language, any dispute with Whatnot must proceed through arbitration under the main Terms of Service, which includes a class action waiver. This means influencers cannot bring class or collective claims and cannot access court proceedings except where the main Terms of Service explicitly permits. The practical effect is that individual influencers seeking to resolve disagreements with Whatnot over payments, account suspension, content disputes, or contractual interpretation must use arbitration rather than litigation.
The updated terms eliminate influencers' ability to pursue disputes in court and require all disagreements with Whatnot to proceed through arbitration with a class action waiver. This materially changes the dispute resolution mechanism available to creators and reduces their practical remedies in cases involving payment disputes, account termination, or contract interpretation.
→ Review the arbitration procedures outlined in Section 21 of Whatnot's main Terms of Service to understand the dispute resolution process that will apply to your account.
→ Document any disputes or concerns with Whatnot payments or account decisions in writing, as disputes will now be resolved through individual arbitration rather than court proceedings.
→ If you do not review the updated arbitration procedures and a dispute arises, your claim will proceed through arbitration as stated in the updated terms, not through court litigation.
→ Any attempt to bring a class action or collective claim against Whatnot will be subject to the class action waiver incorporated from the main Terms of Service, and such claims cannot proceed.
This is the 5th significant Arbitration Expansion change Whatnot has made since ConductAtlas began monitoring.
ConductAtlas has recorded 4 material changes to this document over 40 days of monitoring (since May 2026). An additional minor or cosmetic changes were excluded.
Across all monitored documents, Whatnot has made 7 significant changes.
5 of Whatnot's significant changes have been classified as negative for consumers.
All disputes between influencers and Whatnot must be resolved through arbitration under the main Terms of Service, eliminating court access.
Influencers cannot bring class or collective claims; all disputes must proceed individually through arbitration.
California and Australian court venues previously available to influencers are eliminated; arbitration is the exclusive forum.
This change record describes what was added, removed, or modified in the document. Analysis reflects what the updated agreement states or permits. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Applicability may vary by jurisdiction. Methodology
If you disagree with Whatnot over payments, account decisions, or contract terms, you must use arbitration instead of going to court.
You cannot join other influencers in a group lawsuit against Whatnot; each dispute must be handled individually through arbitration.
+ 1 more obligation changes. Full breakdown available with Monitor.
Track changes →This change consolidates influencer dispute resolution into Whatnot's main arbitration framework, eliminating separate venue provisions in the influencer-specific agreement. Organizations that engage influencers through Whatnot should note that the arbitration and class action waiver provisions in Whatnot's main Terms of Service now govern influencer disputes. This may affect how influencer disputes are managed, how settlement values are evaluated, and how disputes are documented internally. The change was effective June 23, 2026, and applies to all active influencer relationships under the updated terms.
This change may engage state consumer protection statutes and federal arbitration law. The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) generally enforces arbitration clauses, but certain state-level protections against unconscionable arbitration terms or restrictions on class waivers may apply depending on jurisdiction. California and Australian regulators may scrutinize whether the arbitration mandate and class action waiver comply with statutory protections available to consumers in those jurisdictions. The FTC has expressed concerns about arbitration clauses that effectively eliminate access to courts for consumers; this change may warrant monitoring for any regulatory guidance on arbitration in creator-platform relationships.
Full compliance analysis
Obligation analysis, escalation trigger, board language, and recommended action.
Monitor: regulatory citations + obligations. Compliance: full compliance memo.
ConductAtlas provides verified policy intelligence sourced directly from platform documents. All analysis is intended to support, not replace, legal and compliance review. Record CA-C-003239.
See the full side-by-side comparison of every sentence added, removed, and modified.
🔒 Full diff — MonitorWhatnot updated its Influencer Engagement Agreement on June 24, 2026, replacing California-specific litigation procedures with mandatory arbitration under the platform's …
Get alerted when this policy changes again — including what changed and why it matters.
Prefer a weekly summary instead?
Get the biggest policy changes across 320+ platforms every Sunday.