YouTube prohibits content that praises, promotes, or aids violent extremist or criminal organizations, using government and international organization designations to define what counts as such an organization.
This analysis describes what YouTube's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes content moderation standards that align YouTube's platform with legal and regulatory frameworks governing terrorist and criminal organization designations. It structures how the platform enforces compliance with governmental threat classification systems.
YouTube's updated Community Guidelines now explicitly state the platform is expanding likeness detection technology to protect civic leaders and journalists from deepfakes and synthetic media, not just creators and artists. This broadens the scope of automated protection against manipulated video and audio content. While the change does not alter user obligations or remove rights, it signals that detection and enforcement of synthetic media policies may increase for content involving public figures and professional journalists.
View change record →This provision affects both viewers' access to certain content and creators' ability to publish material touching on politically sensitive topics. The reliance on government designation lists means enforcement may vary by jurisdiction and reflect geopolitical considerations beyond YouTube's own editorial standards.
How other platforms handle this
You must not submit any user content to Anker's Services that is or has ever been the subject of any threatened or actual legal proceedings or other similar complaints.
If you believe Your Content was removed in error, you may submit an appeal. More information is available here.
We review account behavior and content that Members create, send, and publish in Mailchimp, including Campaigns and Websites.
The use of government and international organization designations (e.g., OFAC, UN Security Council lists) as enforcement inputs creates compliance complexity for global platform operators and raises questions about due process for creators whose content intersects …
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This provision establishes content moderation standards that align YouTube's platform with legal and regulatory frameworks governing terrorist and criminal organization designations. It structures how the platform enforces compliance with governmental threat classification systems.
This provision affects both viewers' access to certain content and creators' ability to publish material touching on politically sensitive topics. The reliance on government designation lists means enforcement may vary by jurisdiction and reflect geopolitical considerations beyond YouTube's own editorial standards.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 141 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by YouTube.