X maintains a policy classifying and prohibiting non-consensual nudity, commonly known as non-consensual intimate imagery, with defined reporting and enforcement procedures for violations.
This analysis describes what X's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The terms establish that X has a dedicated policy and enforcement mechanism for non-consensual nudity, which is relevant both to victims seeking content removal and to users posting intimate imagery involving others.
Interpretive note: The specific removal timelines, escalation procedures, and definitions of covered content are contained in the linked sub-policy, not this index document.
This provision establishes that X classifies non-consensual nudity as a policy violation with defined reporting procedures, meaning individuals who discover intimate imagery of themselves posted without consent have a documented mechanism to seek removal under this policy.
How other platforms handle this
players may report each other and submit info about their in-game activity and actions to help us determine if the reported behavior constitutes a violation of rules and policies that apply to player conduct
Zoom uses advanced tools to automatically scan certain types of content such as virtual backgrounds, profile images, incoming emails to Zoom's native email service from someone who is not a Zoom Email user, and files uploaded or exchanged through chat...
In assessing misuse, we consider factors such as evidence that a report was motivated by bias or hatred (e.g., based on protected characteristics such as race, sexual orientation, or gender identity) or other malicious intent.
"Non-consensual nudity policy - Learn what we classify as non-consensual nudity and our reporting and enforcement procedures for violations of this policy.Excerpt from X's Rules and Policies
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Non-consensual intimate imagery is criminalized at the federal level in the US under the SHIELD Act and in numerous states, and the EU has addressed it through the Digital Services Act's illegal …
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The terms establish that X has a dedicated policy and enforcement mechanism for non-consensual nudity, which is relevant both to victims seeking content removal and to users posting intimate imagery involving others.
This provision establishes that X classifies non-consensual nudity as a policy violation with defined reporting procedures, meaning individuals who discover intimate imagery of themselves posted without consent have a documented mechanism to seek removal under this policy.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 142 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by X.