The agreement caps Writer's total aggregate liability for all claims arising from the services at $100, and excludes liability for indirect, special, incidental, consequential, or reliance damages including lost data, lost profits, and business interruption. The document acknowledges that some jurisdictions may not permit these limitations.
This analysis describes what Writer's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision limits the maximum financial recovery available to any individual user for all claims related to the services to $100, regardless of the nature or magnitude of the harm alleged. The exclusion of consequential and indirect damages further narrows the categories of recoverable losses under the agreement.
Interpretive note: Enforceability of the $100 cap depends on applicable jurisdiction; some states and the EU may not permit such limitations in consumer contracts.
Under this clause, the maximum amount a user can recover from Writer for any claim related to the services is $100, and categories including lost data, lost profits, and business interruption are excluded from recoverable damages. The document states that some jurisdictions do not permit these limitations, and users in those jurisdictions may retain additional rights.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Aggregate Liability Cap and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →"TO FULLEST EXTENT PERMISSIBLE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW: (A) IN NO EVENT WILL THE WRITER PARTIES BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OF USE, LOST DATA, LOST PROFITS, LOST REVENUES, LOSS OF GOODWILL, INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS OR FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, RELIANCE, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OF ANY KIND, EVEN IF INFORMED OF THEIR POSSIBILITY IN ADVANCE, OR OTHER DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE SERVICES, WHETHER BASED IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT LIABILITY, OR ANY OTHER THEORY; AND (B) THE WRITER PARTIES' TOTAL AGGREGATE LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ALL DAMAGES, LOSSES, AND CAUSES OF ACTION FOR ANY CLAIM RELATED TO THE TO THE SERVICES SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100).Excerpt from Writer's Terms of Service
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Liability caps and consequential damages exclusions in consumer-facing agreements are subject to review under applicable state consumer protection statutes and, in the EU, the Unfair Contract Terms Directive.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This provision limits the maximum financial recovery available to any individual user for all claims related to the services to $100, regardless of the nature or magnitude of the harm alleged. The exclusion of consequential and indirect damages further narrows the categories of recoverable losses under the agreement.
Under this clause, the maximum amount a user can recover from Writer for any claim related to the services is $100, and categories including lost data, lost profits, and business interruption are excluded from recoverable damages. The document states that some jurisdictions do not permit these limitations, and users in those jurisdictions may retain additional rights.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Writer.