This analysis describes what Verizon's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism for dispute resolution, shifting disputes from judicial forums to arbitration. It eliminates the availability of class action proceedings as a dispute resolution avenue, requiring disputes to proceed on an individual basis.
Removal of this high-severity provision significantly expands customer litigation rights by potentially allowing class actions and court proceedings rather than forced arbitration.
View full change record →Users are required to pursue individual binding arbitration for disputes rather than court action, and are prohibited from participating in class actions or collective arbitration. The terms specify that disputes covered by the agreement will follow this arbitration-only pathway as the exclusive remedy mechanism.
How other platforms handle this
If, however, this Class Action Waiver is deemed invalid or unenforceable with respect to a particular Dispute...neither you nor Chegg will be entitled to arbitration of such Dispute.
the arbitration provider, National Arbitration and Mediation ("NAM"), shall not accept or administer any demand for arbitration and shall administratively close any arbitration unless the Party bringing such demand for arbitration can certify in writing that the terms...were fully satisfied.
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
"By accepting Verizon's customer agreement, you agree that any dispute arising under or relating to the agreement will be resolved by binding arbitration and not in a court of law. You waive any right to bring or participate in a class action lawsuit or class-wide arbitration.Excerpt from Verizon's Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism for dispute resolution, shifting disputes from judicial forums to arbitration. It eliminates the availability of class action proceedings as a dispute resolution avenue, requiring disputes to proceed on an individual basis.
Users are required to pursue individual binding arbitration for disputes rather than court action, and are prohibited from participating in class actions or collective arbitration. The terms specify that disputes covered by the agreement will follow this arbitration-only pathway as the exclusive remedy mechanism.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 206 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Verizon.