Provision record
Vercel · Vercel Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Exclusive Jurisdiction in San Francisco Courts

Medium severity Explicit document language Common · 266 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Vercel and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF

This analysis describes what Vercel's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jun 2, 2026

The updated terms establish that users are legally responsible for configuring autonomous AI features and third-party tools, must monitor their settings and output, and are bound by the autonomous actions those tools take on their behalf. Users also bear the cost of any services those third-party tools consume through the Vercel platform. The terms state that Vercel is not responsible for loss, damage, or liability arising from AI or third-party tool actions. You can manage this responsibility by carefully configuring settings, permissions, and safeguards before enabling AI features or third-party integrations, and by establishing human review processes for AI-generated output.

View change record →

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
4
Months Monitored
Jul 10, 2026
First Seen
Jul 10, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 1499 other provisions on other platforms.

How other platforms handle this

Plaid Medium

the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the state and Federal courts located in San Francisco, California

Perplexity AI Medium

it shall be adjudicated exclusively by the state and federal courts located in San Francisco County, California.

Datadog Medium

Any legal action or proceeding arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in the state or federal courts located in New York County, New York, USA...

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
the parties agree to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts in the County of San Francisco.

Excerpt from Vercel's Terms of Service

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Vercel Terms of Service
Entity
Vercel
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-048837
Document ID
CA-D-00547
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
530e1a5b44b728118750762979449b90207ccd518b14fd8e4d06360853cc9927
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 04:58 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Vercel
Document: Vercel Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-048837
Captured: 2026-07-09 04:58:33 UTC
SHA-256: 530e1a5b44b72811…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/vercel/vercel-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-048837/exclusive-jurisdiction-in-san-francisco-courts/
Accessed: Sept. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Vercel's Exclusive Jurisdiction in San Francisco Courts clause do?

The clause states: “the parties agree to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts in the County of San Francisco.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 266 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Vercel?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Vercel.