This analysis describes what Unity's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users bear direct responsibility for the conduct of all agents, employees, or automated systems they use to access Unity's Offerings, with no insulation for third-party or system-driven violations.
Interpretive note: The excerpt references 'any such person or system' without defining the full scope of who or what qualifies; the antecedent of 'such' is not present in the provided excerpt, creating some ambiguity about which persons or systems are covered.
The updated terms establish explicit restrictions on how developers and organizations can use Unity's platform in connection with artificial intelligence and automated systems. Specifically, the terms now require prior written authorization from Unity before training machine learning or AI models on Unity data or any data derived from it. Additionally, the terms restrict automated access to the platform through scrapers, bots, AI agents, large language models, and similar systems unless they operate through a framework designated or operated by Unity. Users remain responsible for any automated systems acting on their behalf, and breaches of these restrictions may result in account suspension. You can request prior authorization from Unity for AI training use cases, and you may review the full updated terms to understand which automated frameworks are Unity-approved.
View change record →The updated terms clarify that users in England will have disputes resolved through the London Court of International Arbitration, with disputes governed by New York law rather than English law. Previously, England was not explicitly listed in the dispute resolution table, creating ambiguity about which arbitration rules and governing law would apply. The revised language removes this ambiguity but establishes that England-based users will proceed through arbitration in London under New York substantive law. Users in other regions (Asia-Pacific, China/Hong Kong/Macau, and worldwide locations) see reorganized dispute resolution tables with the same arbitration rules and governing law, but clearer formatting.
View change record →The reader is held accountable for Terms violations committed by any person or system acting on their behalf, as if the reader had committed them directly.
How other platforms handle this
This is still Your Content, and you are responsible for it and its accuracy, as well as your use of it on our Services and any and all decisions made, actions taken, and failures to take action based on Your Content.
You are responsible for any content, data, or instructions submitted to the Services via any Automated System. Instacart's license to use user content...includes content submitted by or through Automated Systems...
Respond truthfully to any question or prompt seeking to determine if interactions are coming from a human or a computer.
Monitoring
Unity has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"any act or omission of any such person or system that is not in compliance with these Terms will constitute an act or omission by you.— Excerpt from Unity's Unity Terms of Service
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
Users bear direct responsibility for the conduct of all agents, employees, or automated systems they use to access Unity's Offerings, with no insulation for third-party or system-driven violations.
The reader is held accountable for Terms violations committed by any person or system acting on their behalf, as if the reader had committed them directly.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 211 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Unity.