Provision record
Uniswap · Uniswap Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Mandatory Arbitration and Class Action Waiver

High severity Medium confidence Explicit document language Common · 205 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Uniswap and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

The agreement requires users to resolve disputes with Uniswap Labs through individual binding arbitration rather than through court litigation, and waives users' ability to participate in class action proceedings.

This analysis describes what Uniswap's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision establishes that all disputes must proceed through individual arbitration, which is administered outside of the court system, and forecloses class action participation; the enforceability of these terms may vary by jurisdiction and claim type, and applicable consumer protection statutes in certain states may limit their scope.

Interpretive note: The full arbitration clause text including specific opt-out procedures, administrator, and applicable rules was not fully reproduced in the document excerpt provided; enforceability also varies by jurisdiction and claim type.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jul 8, 2026

The updated terms establish new contractual representations that users must make when agreeing to the agreement. Users now represent that they are not subject to economic or trade sanctions administered by any governmental authority, including OFAC lists, and that they are not citizens or residents of sanctioned jurisdictions. Users also represent that their access and use will comply with all applicable laws and will not be used to conduct or facilitate illegal activity. These representations are legally binding attestations that may be verified. Users in OFAC-sanctioned countries cannot truthfully make these representations and would be unable to use the platform.

View change record →
Medium Jun 19, 2026

The updated terms establish new restrictions on user conduct and add affirmative representations regarding asset eligibility. Users trading tokenized real-world assets (such as tokenized stocks, ETFs, or commodities) must now represent that they have reviewed issuer information and comply with any restrictions on trading or holding those assets. The terms also explicitly prohibit circumventing access restrictions, including geographic blocks and transfer limitations imposed by token issuers. By continuing to use the platform, users affirm they are legally eligible to trade tokens under their jurisdiction's laws.

View change record →
Medium May 28, 2026

The updated terms establish that Uniswap does not warrant that any digital asset accessible through its products is available for trading, holding, or transacting in your jurisdiction, or that you are legally permitted to do so. The revised language places the burden on you to determine whether a digital asset is lawfully available to you and to comply with any applicable transfer restrictions imposed by asset issuers or regulatory authorities. This means accessing or trading an asset through the Uniswap interface does not constitute Uniswap's determination that you are eligible to do so under your local laws.

View change record →

Clause Stability Mostly Stable

1
Change
5
Months Monitored
May 21, 2026
First Seen
Jul 9, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 2555 other provisions on other platforms.
This clause has changed once in 5 months of monitoring.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, users who have disputes with Uniswap Labs are required to pursue those disputes through individual arbitration rather than in court, and the agreement waives participation in any class action proceeding. The agreement specifies that accessing or using any Product constitutes acceptance of these terms.

What you can do

⚠️ These actions may provide transparency or partial mitigation but may not fully address the underlying issue. Effectiveness varies by jurisdiction and individual circumstances.
  • Opt Out of Arbitration
    Within 30 days
    Review the full terms of service for any arbitration opt-out mechanism and deadline. If an opt-out is available, submit written notice by the stated method within the stated deadline period.

How other platforms handle this

Chegg Medium

If, however, this Class Action Waiver is deemed invalid or unenforceable with respect to a particular Dispute...neither you nor Chegg will be entitled to arbitration of such Dispute.

Tinder Medium

the arbitration provider, National Arbitration and Mediation ("NAM"), shall not accept or administer any demand for arbitration and shall administratively close any arbitration unless the Party bringing such demand for arbitration can certify in writing that the terms...were fully satisfied.

Wise Medium

Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
NOTICE: This Agreement contains important information, including a binding arbitration provision and a class action waiver, both of which impact your rights as to how disputes are resolved. Our Products are only available to you — and you should only access any of our Products — if you agree completely with these terms.

Excerpt from Uniswap's Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The mandatory arbitration clause and class action waiver are governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →
  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Uniswap Terms of Service
Entity
Uniswap
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-013115
Document ID
CA-D-00303
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
589beea39094385e4e6ae18bcb712f7df33b7c0a2d234ca3ebe41af6b28da987
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 07:01 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Uniswap
Document: Uniswap Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-013115
Captured: 2026-07-09 07:01:18 UTC
SHA-256: 589beea39094385e…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/uniswap/uniswap-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-013115/mandatory-arbitration-and-class-action-waiver/
Accessed: Sept. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Uniswap's Mandatory Arbitration and Class Action Waiver clause do?

This provision establishes that all disputes must proceed through individual arbitration, which is administered outside of the court system, and forecloses class action participation; the enforceability of these terms may vary by jurisdiction and claim type, and applicable consumer protection statutes in certain states may limit their scope.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, users who have disputes with Uniswap Labs are required to pursue those disputes through individual arbitration rather than in court, and the agreement waives participation in any class action proceeding. The agreement specifies that accessing or using any Product constitutes acceptance of these terms.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 205 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Uniswap?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Uniswap.