This analysis describes what Uniswap's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Acknowledging these provisions signals that users are on notice that their options for pursuing legal action against Uniswap are materially constrained by arbitration and class action waiver requirements.
The updated terms establish explicit prohibitions on circumventing access restrictions for tokens, including geographic and transfer restrictions imposed by token issuers. Users are now required to represent that they have reviewed issuer information about tokenized assets (stocks, ETFs, commodities) and comply with any restrictions on trading or holding these assets in their jurisdiction. The terms state that certain assets may not be available in all locations, and users must confirm they are eligible to trade these tokens under their local laws. If you trade tokenized assets, review the issuer restrictions and confirm your jurisdiction permits the trades you intend to execute.
View change record →The updated terms establish that Uniswap does not warrant the availability or legality of any digital asset in your jurisdiction, and does not represent that you are permitted to acquire, hold, or transact in any asset accessible through the platform. The revised language places full responsibility on you to determine whether any digital asset is lawfully available to you and to comply with any applicable transfer or holding restrictions. This means Uniswap is disclaiming liability for your compliance with local laws, KYC requirements, whitelisting requirements, or jurisdictional restrictions that may apply to specific assets.
View change record →Users are required to acknowledge upfront that their dispute resolution rights are affected by a binding arbitration provision and a class action waiver.
How other platforms handle this
We will notify you of amendments to this Arbitration Agreement by posting the amended terms on anyscale.com/terms at least 30 days before the effective date of the amendments and by providing notice through email where possible.
If any part of these arbitration terms is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the remainder will remain in effect, except that if a finding...would allow class arbitration...this entire dispute resolution section will be unenforceable.
you may reject the change by sending us written notice within 30 days of the change to Credit Karma's address for Notice, in which case your account with Credit Karma will be immediately terminated
"This Agreement contains important information, including a binding arbitration provision and a class action waiver, both of which impact your rights as to how disputes are resolved.Excerpt from Uniswap's Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
Acknowledging these provisions signals that users are on notice that their options for pursuing legal action against Uniswap are materially constrained by arbitration and class action waiver requirements.
Users are required to acknowledge upfront that their dispute resolution rights are affected by a binding arbitration provision and a class action waiver.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Uniswap.