Uniswap · Uniswap Terms of Service · View original document ↗

OFAC and Sanctions-Based Access Prohibition

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Uniswap recorded 12 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for Uniswap Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

The agreement prohibits access by users who are on OFAC or other governmental sanctions lists, or who are citizens, residents, or entities organized in jurisdictions subject to comprehensive U.S. economic sanctions, and requires users to represent compliance with all applicable laws as a condition of access.

This analysis describes what Uniswap's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision establishes user-level sanctions compliance representations as a contractual condition of access to all products. The provision relies on user self-attestation rather than specifying any technical or identity-based verification mechanism, which is an operationally relevant distinction for compliance assessment of whether the restriction is actively enforced.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, users must represent at the point of access that they are not subject to OFAC designation, not on prohibited party lists, and not located in or organized under the laws of a comprehensively sanctioned jurisdiction. The agreement does not describe any technical access restriction or identity verification mechanism for enforcing this prohibition; enforcement of this provision relies on user representation.

How other platforms handle this

Redfin Medium

You may not automatedly crawl or query the Services for any purpose or by any means (including, without limitation, screen and database scraping, spiders, robots, crawlers and any other automated activity with the purpose of obtaining information from the Services) unless you have received prior exp...

PayPal Medium

relate to transactions involving (f) the promotion of hate, violence, racial or other forms of intolerance that is discriminatory or the financial exploitation of a crime... (i) involve offering or receiving payments for the purpose of bribery or corruption.

Stripe Medium

You must not, and must not allow others to: Facilitate illegal or harmful activity through the End User Services; Cause harm to us or others through the End User Services;

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Uniswap has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You further represent that you are not (a) the subject of economic or trade sanctions administered or enforced by any governmental authority or otherwise designated on any list of prohibited or restricted parties (including but not limited to the list maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury) or (b) a citizen, resident, or organized in a jurisdiction or territory that is the subject of comprehensive country-wide, territory-wide, or regional economic sanctions by the United States. Finally, you represent that your access and use of any of our Products will fully comply with all applicable laws and regulations, and that you will not access or use any of our Products to conduct, promote, or otherwise facilitate any illegal activity.

— Excerpt from Uniswap's Uniswap Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: OFAC sanctions compliance requirements apply to U.S. persons and entities, and to transactions involving U.S. jurisdiction, under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and related statutes. OFAC has issued guidance specific to digital asset businesses, and failure to screen users against OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals list can result in civil and criminal penalties regardless of whether the company relied on user self-attestation. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and state money transmitter licensing frameworks may impose independent user verification obligations depending on the regulatory classification of Uniswap Labs' products. 2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. The reliance on user-representation-only sanctions compliance, without described technical screening or identity verification, may not satisfy OFAC compliance program standards applicable to financial service providers, particularly if Uniswap Labs' products are classified as money services or financial intermediaries. OFAC has previously penalized virtual asset service providers for sanctions violations where user self-attestation was the sole control. 3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: U.S. sanctions law applies extraterritorially in certain circumstances, creating exposure for non-U.S. users and for transactions that touch U.S. financial infrastructure. Jurisdictions with residents subject to comprehensive U.S. sanctions include Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Syria, and the Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk regions, among others, as designated by OFAC. 4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Third-party partners accessing Uniswap Labs APIs or integrating the interface into their platforms should assess their own independent OFAC compliance obligations and should not rely on Uniswap Labs' user representation mechanism as a substitute for their own screening programs. 5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal and compliance teams should assess whether Uniswap Labs' products qualify as a virtual asset service provider or money services business under applicable definitions, which would trigger independent OFAC compliance program requirements including transaction screening, customer identification, and recordkeeping obligations beyond user self-attestation.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has consumer protection jurisdiction over representations made in consumer-facing agreements, including eligibility and access conditions
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

CFAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Uniswap Terms of Service
Entity
Uniswap
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 21, 2026
Last verified
May 21, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-013117
Document ID
CA-D-00303
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
c1d35f33490ba678f2bcbc199052724d38fc70909e41d9182f0a898576833667
Analysis generated
May 21, 2026 05:16 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Uniswap
Document: Uniswap Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-013117
Captured: 2026-05-21 05:16:34 UTC
SHA-256: c1d35f33490ba678…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/uniswap/uniswap-terms-of-service/ofac-and-sanctions-based-access-prohibition/
Accessed: June 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Uniswap's OFAC and Sanctions-Based Access Prohibition clause do?

This provision establishes user-level sanctions compliance representations as a contractual condition of access to all products. The provision relies on user self-attestation rather than specifying any technical or identity-based verification mechanism, which is an operationally relevant distinction for compliance assessment of whether the restriction is actively enforced.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, users must represent at the point of access that they are not subject to OFAC designation, not on prohibited party lists, and not located in or organized under the laws of a comprehensively sanctioned jurisdiction. The agreement does not describe any technical access restriction or identity verification mechanism for enforcing this prohibition; enforcement of this provision relies …

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Uniswap?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Uniswap.