If you have a dispute with Together AI, you must resolve it through a private arbitration process run by JAMS in San Francisco rather than going to court, with limited exceptions for small claims.
This analysis describes what Together AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision requires users to pursue individual arbitration rather than litigation, which changes the forum, process, and practical economics of seeking legal redress against Together AI.
Users cannot sue Together AI in court for most disputes and must instead use JAMS arbitration in San Francisco, California, which may involve filing fees and procedural steps that differ significantly from small claims or civil court processes.
How other platforms handle this
This Arbitration Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall include any claims brought by or against any third parties, including but not limited to your spouses, heirs, third-party beneficiaries and permitted assigns...
the arbitration provider, National Arbitration and Mediation ("NAM"), shall not accept or administer any demand for arbitration and shall administratively close any arbitration unless the Party bringing such demand for arbitration can certify in writing that the terms...were fully satisfied.
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
"ANY DISPUTE, CONTROVERSY, OR CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THESE TERMS OR THE SERVICES WILL BE RESOLVED BY BINDING ARBITRATION, RATHER THAN IN COURT, EXCEPT THAT YOU MAY ASSERT CLAIMS IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT IF YOUR CLAIMS QUALIFY. THE ARBITRATION WILL BE CONDUCTED BY JAMS UNDER ITS APPLICABLE RULES. THE ARBITRATION WILL BE CONDUCTED IN SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, UNLESS WE AGREE OTHERWISE.Excerpt from Together AI's Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer contracts are subject to scrutiny under the FTC Act and state consumer protection statutes.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This provision requires users to pursue individual arbitration rather than litigation, which changes the forum, process, and practical economics of seeking legal redress against Together AI.
Users cannot sue Together AI in court for most disputes and must instead use JAMS arbitration in San Francisco, California, which may involve filing fees and procedural steps that differ significantly from small claims or civil court processes.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 206 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Together AI.