California law governs the agreement, and for any disputes that go to court rather than arbitration, the case must be heard in San Francisco, California.
This analysis describes what Together AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users outside California who have disputes not subject to arbitration must litigate in San Francisco courts, which may create practical and financial barriers to pursuing claims.
Users located outside California who have claims not resolved through arbitration must pursue them in San Francisco courts under California law, which may impose geographic and cost barriers on out-of-state users.
How other platforms handle this
In the EU and EEA, the choice of Texas governing law shall not apply only where a mandatory consumer protection law explicitly prohibits such choice of law provisions.
For any claims that are not subject to arbitration...U.S. Residents: Delaware law; venue exclusively in the state or federal courts in New Castle County, Delaware
These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of California and the United States without regard to conflicts of laws provisions
"These Terms are governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to its conflict of law provisions. You and Together AI agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in San Francisco, California for any disputes not subject to arbitration.Excerpt from Together AI's Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Forum selection and choice-of-law clauses are generally enforceable in commercial contracts but may face challenges in consumer contracts where they impose significant hardship.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
Users outside California who have disputes not subject to arbitration must litigate in San Francisco courts, which may create practical and financial barriers to pursuing claims.
Users located outside California who have claims not resolved through arbitration must pursue them in San Francisco courts under California law, which may impose geographic and cost barriers on out-of-state users.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 266 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Together AI.