“any Dispute (that is not resolved informally by Tinder Customer Service or the informal dispute resolution process as provided under subsection 15a above) shall be exclusively resolved through BINDING INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION...”
This analysis describes what Tinder's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The exclusive binding arbitration requirement eliminates court litigation as an option for disputes that cannot be resolved informally, fundamentally altering how users can pursue claims against Tinder.
If your dispute with Tinder is not resolved informally, you are required to resolve it through binding individual arbitration rather than in court.
How other platforms handle this
This section does not require informal dispute resolution or arbitration of the following claims: (i) individual claims brought in small claims court...
you may reject the change by sending us written notice within 30 days of the change to Credit Karma's address for Notice, in which case your account with Credit Karma will be immediately terminated
"any Dispute (that is not resolved informally by Tinder Customer Service or the informal dispute resolution process as provided under subsection 15a above) shall be exclusively resolved through BINDING INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION...Excerpt from Tinder's Terms of Use
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The exclusive binding arbitration requirement eliminates court litigation as an option for disputes that cannot be resolved informally, fundamentally altering how users can pursue claims against Tinder.
If your dispute with Tinder is not resolved informally, you are required to resolve it through binding individual arbitration rather than in court.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Tinder.