Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
The agreement caps Substack's total aggregate liability to any user at the greater of $100 or the amounts the user paid to Substack in the preceding twelve months, and excludes indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages entirely. This cap applies to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
This analysis describes what Substack's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes a specific monetary ceiling on Substack's liability exposure per claim, which for free-tier users would be capped at $100. The exclusion of consequential and indirect damages limits the categories of loss users may recover in any dispute proceeding, including through the arbitration process established elsewhere in the agreement.
Removal of specific liability cap language naming 'Limitation of Liability Cap' suggests potential restructuring, though similar language appears under renamed 'Limitation of Liability' provision.
View full change record →This provision establishes that Substack's maximum liability for any claim is the greater of $100 or amounts paid in the prior twelve months, meaning free users have a $100 ceiling on potential recovery. The agreement also excludes indirect, special, incidental, and consequential damages from any recovery, limiting the types of loss that can be claimed against the platform.
How other platforms handle this
If you knowingly misrepresent that any activity or material on our Services is infringing, you may be liable to ActiveCampaign for certain costs and damages.
A party's liability for any Liability under these Terms will be reduced proportionately to the extent the relevant Liability was caused or contributed to by the actions (or inactions) of the other party...
The Netflix service and/or some of the Netflix content may not be available at any time as a result of events beyond our reasonable control...we will not be held liable should such events occur.
Monitoring
Substack has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"To the fullest extent allowed by applicable law, under no circumstances and under no legal theory shall Substack, its licensors, or its suppliers be liable to you or to any other person for: Any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind, or Any amount, in the aggregate, in excess of the greater of (1) $100 or (2) the amounts paid and/or payable by you to us in connection with Substack in the twelve-month period preceding the applicable claim.Excerpt from Substack's Terms of Use
1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Limitation of liability clauses in consumer contracts are subject to review under applicable state consumer protection laws, including California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act, which may restrict the enforceability of liability caps in certain consumer contexts. The FTC Act's prohibition on unfair or deceptive practices is broadly relevant. EU consumer protection law may render liability limitation clauses unenforceable against EU consumers for gross negligence or willful misconduct. 2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The $100 floor for free users is a low absolute cap that limits recovery for platform-related losses. This is a common structure in platform terms but the specific dollar amount creates a concrete operational boundary for any dispute resolution proceeding. The clause applies to both individual users and organizational accounts. 3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: California courts may scrutinize liability caps under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act for certain categories of consumer claims. EU users may find the clause unenforceable under the EU Unfair Terms Directive to the extent it excludes liability for gross negligence or intentional acts. The qualifying phrase 'to the fullest extent allowed by applicable law' preserves some flexibility for jurisdictional variation. 4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations using Substack as part of a commercial publishing workflow should note that the liability cap applies regardless of the scale of organizational use or the value of content hosted. The twelve-month payment lookback period means high-volume paid subscribers have a higher effective cap, but the consequential damages exclusion applies universally regardless of amounts paid. 5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should assess whether the liability cap is enforceable under the laws of the jurisdictions where organizational users are located. Risk assessments for platform dependency on Substack should account for the practical ceiling on recoverable damages in the event of service disruption, data loss, or content removal disputes.
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes a specific monetary ceiling on Substack's liability exposure per claim, which for free-tier users would be capped at $100. The exclusion of consequential and indirect damages limits the categories of loss users may recover in any dispute proceeding, including through the arbitration process established elsewhere in the agreement.
This provision establishes that Substack's maximum liability for any claim is the greater of $100 or amounts paid in the prior twelve months, meaning free users have a $100 ceiling on potential recovery. The agreement also excludes indirect, special, incidental, and consequential damages from any recovery, limiting the types of loss that can be claimed against the platform.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 292 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Substack.