This analysis describes what Stash's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Any legal action or proceeding arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in the state or federal courts located in New York County, New York, USA...
For any dispute relating to this Agreement, the parties consent to personal jurisdiction and the exclusive venue of the courts in New York County, New York.
the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the state and Federal courts located in San Francisco, California
"you and we agree and irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York and...of the federal courts in the Southern District of New York with respect to any legal action or proceeding...Excerpt from Stash's Terms of Use
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “you and we agree and irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York and...of the federal courts in the Southern District of New York with respect to any legal action or proceeding...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stash.